1993Unpublished venueRequires access

Race and the jury

Hiroshi Fukurai, Edgar W. Butler, Richard Krooth

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

The jury is one of our most democratic institutions. A random sample of the community is asked to render an impartial verdict in a case after hearing evidence from both sides. The notion that ordinary men and women of good will can and will exercise good judgment is basic to our tradition of government by the people. Furthermore, a jury’s verdict is assumed to reflect the collective sentiments and conscience of the community and therefore carries a legitimacy that cannot be attained by experts, no matter how intelligent and skillful they may be.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The jury is one of our most democratic institutions. A random sample of the community is asked to render an impartial verdict in a case after hearing evidence from both sides. The notion that ordinary men and women of good will can and will exercise good judgment is basic to our tradition of government by the people. Furthermore, a jury’s verdict is assumed to reflect the collective sentiments and conscience of the community and therefore carries a legitimacy that cannot be attained by experts, no matter how intelligent and skillful they may be.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The jury is one of our most democratic institutions. A random sample of the community is asked to render an impartial verdict in a case after hearing evidence from both sides. The notion that ordinary men and women of good will can and will exercise good judgment is basic to our tradition of government by the people. Furthermore, a jury’s verdict is assumed to reflect the collective sentiments and conscience of the community and therefore carries a legitimacy that cannot be attained by experts, no matter how intelligent and skillful they may be.

Key concepts: Verdict, Jury, Legitimacy, Conscience, Race (biology), Hung jury, Political science, Government (linguistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Race and the jury — Research Paper | ScholarLens