Race and the jury
Hiroshi Fukurai, Edgar W. Butler, Richard Krooth
Abstract
Hiroshi Fukurai, Edgar W. Butler, Richard Krooth
Abstract
The jury is one of our most democratic institutions. A random sample of the community is asked to render an impartial verdict in a case after hearing evidence from both sides. The notion that ordinary men and women of good will can and will exercise good judgment is basic to our tradition of government by the people. Furthermore, a jury’s verdict is assumed to reflect the collective sentiments and conscience of the community and therefore carries a legitimacy that cannot be attained by experts, no matter how intelligent and skillful they may be.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The jury is one of our most democratic institutions. A random sample of the community is asked to render an impartial verdict in a case after hearing evidence from both sides. The notion that ordinary men and women of good will can and will exercise good judgment is basic to our tradition of government by the people. Furthermore, a jury’s verdict is assumed to reflect the collective sentiments and conscience of the community and therefore carries a legitimacy that cannot be attained by experts, no matter how intelligent and skillful they may be.
Key concepts: Verdict, Jury, Legitimacy, Conscience, Race (biology), Hung jury, Political science, Government (linguistics)