Mathematical Proof Construction: Students’ Ability in Higher Education
Minatun Nadlifah, Sufyani Prabawanto
Abstract
Open-access reader
Minatun Nadlifah, Sufyani Prabawanto
Abstract
Open-access reader
This study aimed to categorizing and describing students' ability in constructing a mathematics proof. This study used descriptive-qualitative approach which involved 46 mathematics undergraduate students. The results showed that the students' ability in mathematical proof constructing consist 2 phases, that is, visual proof and symbolic proof. Students were not using the concepts and definitions in order to constructing mathematics proof. Consequently, reinforcement of concepts will improve students' ability to constructing an argument or explanation in mathematical proof.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study aimed to categorizing and describing students' ability in constructing a mathematics proof. This study used descriptive-qualitative approach which involved 46 mathematics undergraduate students. The results showed that the students' ability in mathematical proof constructing consist 2 phases, that is, visual proof and symbolic proof. Students were not using the concepts and definitions in order to constructing mathematics proof. Consequently, reinforcement of concepts will improve students' ability to constructing an argument or explanation in mathematical proof.
Key concepts: Mathematics education, Proof of concept, Mathematical proof, Argument (complex analysis), Mathematical logic, Structural proof theory, Computer-assisted proof, Mathematical induction