2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

Measurement and Analysis of Sound Absorption Coefficient by the Method of Reverberation Chamber and Impedance Tube

Ming Zhang, Yan Liu, Xiaopai Zhang, Xiaojuan Zhang, Chang- Bin Zhang, Zhifang Zhong

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

testing the sound absorption coefficient of three kinds of materials through the reverberation chamber method and impedance tube method, materials are sound-absorbing cotton, sponge and microporous sound-absorbing panels. The relationship between the sound absorption coefficient measured by two methods is analyzed and the following conclusions are drawn: random-incidence sound absorption coefficient and normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient of soundabsorbing cotton material changing with frequency in the similar trend, the peak value of sound absorption coefficient is in 800Hz, random-incidence sound absorption coefficient is larger than normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient; random- incidence sound absorption coefficient and normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient of sponge material changing with frequency in the similar trend, the peak value of sound absorption coefficient is in 800Hz, in 100Hz ~ 630Hz frequency band, random-incidence sound absorption coefficient is larger than normalincidence sound absorption coefficient, in 800Hz ~ 5000Hz frequency band, the difference between two kinds of sound absorption coefficient is very small; randomincidence sound absorption coefficient is larger than normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient of microporous sound-absorbing panels, the peak value of sound absorption coefficient is in 1250Hz, in 100Hz ~ 500Hz frequency band, two kinds of sound absorption coefficient are basically same, in 630Hz ~ 2500Hz frequency band, the curve trend of two kinds of sound absorption coefficient is basically the same, and random-incidence sound absorption coefficient is less than normal- incidence sound absorption coefficient. The results of the study provide a basis for the different test requirements and practical application of sound absorbing materials.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

testing the sound absorption coefficient of three kinds of materials through the reverberation chamber method and impedance tube method, materials are sound-absorbing cotton, sponge and microporous sound-absorbing panels. The relationship between the sound absorption coefficient measured by two methods is analyzed and the following conclusions are drawn: random-incidence sound absorption coefficient and normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient of soundabsorbing cotton material changing with frequency in the similar trend, the peak value of sound absorption coefficient is in 800Hz, random-incidence sound absorption coefficient is larger than normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient; random- incidence sound absorption coefficient and normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient of sponge material changing with frequency in the similar trend, the peak value of sound absorption coefficient is in 800Hz, in 100Hz ~ 630Hz frequency band, random-incidence sound absorption coefficient is larger than normalincidence sound absorption coefficient, in 800Hz ~ 5000Hz frequency band, the difference between two kinds of sound absorption coefficient is very small; randomincidence sound absorption coefficient is larger than normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient of microporous sound-absorbing panels, the peak value of sound absorption coefficient is in 1250Hz, in 100Hz ~ 500Hz frequency band, two kinds of sound absorption coefficient are basically same, in 630Hz ~ 2500Hz frequency band, the curve trend of two kinds of sound absorption coefficient is basically the same, and random-incidence sound absorption coefficient is less than normal- incidence sound absorption coefficient. The results of the study provide a basis for the different test requirements and practical application of sound absorbing materials.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

testing the sound absorption coefficient of three kinds of materials through the reverberation chamber method and impedance tube method, materials are sound-absorbing cotton, sponge and microporous sound-absorbing panels. The relationship between the sound absorption coefficient measured by two methods is analyzed and the following conclusions are drawn: random-incidence sound absorption coefficient and normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient of soundabsorbing cotton material changing with frequency in the similar trend, the peak value of sound absorption coefficient is in 800Hz, random-incidence sound absorption coefficient is larger than normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient; random- incidence sound absorption coefficient and normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient of sponge material changing with frequency in the similar trend, the peak value of sound absorption coefficient is in 800Hz, in 100Hz ~ 630Hz frequency band, random-incidence sound absorption coefficient is larger than normalincidence sound absorption coefficient, in 800Hz ~ 5000Hz frequency band, the difference between two kinds of sound absorption coefficient is very small; randomincidence sound absorption coefficient is larger than normal-incidence sound absorption coefficient of microporous sound-absorbing panels, the peak value of sound absorption coefficient is in 1250Hz, in 100Hz ~ 500Hz frequency band, two kinds of sound absorption coefficient are basically same, in 630Hz ~ 2500Hz frequency band, the curve trend of two kinds of sound absorption coefficient is basically the same, and random-incidence sound absorption coefficient is less than normal- incidence sound absorption coefficient. The results of the study provide a basis for the different test requirements and practical application of sound absorbing materials.

Key concepts: Noise reduction coefficient, Attenuation coefficient, Absorption (acoustics), Reverberation room, Materials science, Reverberation, Acoustics, Acoustic impedance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measurement and Analysis of Sound Absorption Coefficient by the Method of Reverberation Chamber and Impedance Tube — Research Paper | ScholarLens