IMPERFECT COMPETITION AND THE TAXATION OF INTERMEDIATE GOODS
Gareth D. Myles
Abstract
Open-access reader
Gareth D. Myles
Abstract
Open-access reader
It is an implication of the productive efficiency lemma of Diamond and Mirrlees that intermediate goods should not be taxed in a world of constant returns to scale and perfect competition. Three simple models are analysed to examine whether this conclusion can be extended to accommodate imperfect competition. The importance of returns to scale and the form of the production function are emphasised and, where applicable, welfare-improving and optimal tax schemes are described that include taxes on intermediate goods. If all technologies are Leontief, productive efficiency remains desirable.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It is an implication of the productive efficiency lemma of Diamond and Mirrlees that intermediate goods should not be taxed in a world of constant returns to scale and perfect competition. Three simple models are analysed to examine whether this conclusion can be extended to accommodate imperfect competition. The importance of returns to scale and the form of the production function are emphasised and, where applicable, welfare-improving and optimal tax schemes are described that include taxes on intermediate goods. If all technologies are Leontief, productive efficiency remains desirable.
Key concepts: Returns to scale, Imperfect competition, Economics, Lemma (botany), Production (economics), Microeconomics, Competition (biology), Imperfect