2003Dialogue and UniversalismOpen access

The Idea of a Cultural Aesthetic

Arnold Berleant

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In its search for universal knowledge, philosophy has become mired in its own presuppositions. However, if we use as our touchstone what is common and what is diverse in human experience, recognizing all the while that experience itself is never pure but historically and culturally conditioned, we shall find that the nature of inquiry changes. How can we characterize such experience? Examining the meaning of culture and its influence on perception and on art, we find ourselves led toward landscape and, more generally, environment as embodying the history of culture. The idea of a cultural aesthetic can be developed on three levels: the distinctive sensibility of a particular culture, the theoretical elaboration of that sensibility, and a metaesthetic analysis of such theories. This essay mainly concerns the second, arguing for the recognition of an irreducible plurality of theories, yet suggesting that some basis for generality lies hidden amid the diversity of cultural aesthetics in the form of a cluster of factors that are typically present.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In its search for universal knowledge, philosophy has become mired in its own presuppositions. However, if we use as our touchstone what is common and what is diverse in human experience, recognizing all the while that experience itself is never pure but historically and culturally conditioned, we shall find that the nature of inquiry changes. How can we characterize such experience? Examining the meaning of culture and its influence on perception and on art, we find ourselves led toward landscape and, more generally, environment as embodying the history of culture. The idea of a cultural aesthetic can be developed on three levels: the distinctive sensibility of a particular culture, the theoretical elaboration of that sensibility, and a metaesthetic analysis of such theories. This essay mainly concerns the second, arguing for the recognition of an irreducible plurality of theories, yet suggesting that some basis for generality lies hidden amid the diversity of cultural aesthetics in the form of a cluster of factors that are typically present.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In its search for universal knowledge, philosophy has become mired in its own presuppositions. However, if we use as our touchstone what is common and what is diverse in human experience, recognizing all the while that experience itself is never pure but historically and culturally conditioned, we shall find that the nature of inquiry changes. How can we characterize such experience? Examining the meaning of culture and its influence on perception and on art, we find ourselves led toward landscape and, more generally, environment as embodying the history of culture. The idea of a cultural aesthetic can be developed on three levels: the distinctive sensibility of a particular culture, the theoretical elaboration of that sensibility, and a metaesthetic analysis of such theories. This essay mainly concerns the second, arguing for the recognition of an irreducible plurality of theories, yet suggesting that some basis for generality lies hidden amid the diversity of cultural aesthetics in the form of a cluster of factors that are typically present.

Key concepts: Aesthetics, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source