2017•Journal of AsthmaRequires access

The effect of bronchodilation and spirometry on fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO50), bronchial NO flux (JawNO) and alveolar NO concentration (CANO) in children and young adults

Τheodoros Karampitsakos, Adonis A Protopapas, Maria Gianoloudi, Vasileios P Papadopoulos, Demosthenes E. Bouros, Athanasios Chatzimichael, Emmanouil Paraskakis

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Objective: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), bronchial nitric oxide (JawNO) and alveoar nitric oxide (CANO) are biomarkers of eosinophilic inflammation, usually measured simultaneously with spirometry and bronchodilation. Our aim was to investigate the effect of bronchodilation and spirometry on FeNO, CANO and JawNO in children and young adults with well-controlled asthma and in healthy volunteers. Methods: FeNO was measured in 95 subjects (62 controls, 33 asthmatics). CANO and JawNO were assessed in 41 of the subjects (35 healthy, 6 asthmatics.) Measurements were performed before spirometry (1), right after spirometry (2), 20 min after the first spirometry and bronchodilation (3), right after the post-bronchodilation spirometry (4) and 30 min after the last spirometry (5). Results: The presence of well-controlled asthma was not associated with different pattern of reaction after spirometry and bronchodilation. A statistically significant difference was observed only between FeNO4 and FeNO5, as well as between CANO1 and CANO3 (19.14 ± 1.68 vs 20.62 ± 1.85 ppb, p = 0.001 and 4.42 ± 0.40 vs 3.09±0.32 ppb, p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Spirometry and bronchodilation have an insignificant effect on FeNO and JawNO. Even if a slight change occurs in FeNO and JawNO, this does not modify clinician's decision and therapeutic strategy. CANO values (CANO1) are significantly decreased 20 min after spirometry and bronchodilation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), bronchial nitric oxide (JawNO) and alveoar nitric oxide (CANO) are biomarkers of eosinophilic inflammation, usually measured simultaneously with spirometry and bronchodilation. Our aim was to investigate the effect of bronchodilation and spirometry on FeNO, CANO and JawNO in children and young adults with well-controlled asthma and in healthy volunteers. Methods: FeNO was measured in 95 subjects (62 controls, 33 asthmatics). CANO and JawNO were assessed in 41 of the subjects (35 healthy, 6 asthmatics.) Measurements were performed before spirometry (1), right after spirometry (2), 20 min after the first spirometry and bronchodilation (3), right after the post-bronchodilation spirometry (4) and 30 min after the last spirometry (5). Results: The presence of well-controlled asthma was not associated with different pattern of reaction after spirometry and bronchodilation. A statistically significant difference was observed only between FeNO4 and FeNO5, as well as between CANO1 and CANO3 (19.14 ± 1.68 vs 20.62 ± 1.85 ppb, p = 0.001 and 4.42 ± 0.40 vs 3.09±0.32 ppb, p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Spirometry and bronchodilation have an insignificant effect on FeNO and JawNO. Even if a slight change occurs in FeNO and JawNO, this does not modify clinician's decision and therapeutic strategy. CANO values (CANO1) are significantly decreased 20 min after spirometry and bronchodilation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), bronchial nitric oxide (JawNO) and alveoar nitric oxide (CANO) are biomarkers of eosinophilic inflammation, usually measured simultaneously with spirometry and bronchodilation. Our aim was to investigate the effect of bronchodilation and spirometry on FeNO, CANO and JawNO in children and young adults with well-controlled asthma and in healthy volunteers. Methods: FeNO was measured in 95 subjects (62 controls, 33 asthmatics). CANO and JawNO were assessed in 41 of the subjects (35 healthy, 6 asthmatics.) Measurements were performed before spirometry (1), right after spirometry (2), 20 min after the first spirometry and bronchodilation (3), right after the post-bronchodilation spirometry (4) and 30 min after the last spirometry (5). Results: The presence of well-controlled asthma was not associated with different pattern of reaction after spirometry and bronchodilation. A statistically significant difference was observed only between FeNO4 and FeNO5, as well as between CANO1 and CANO3 (19.14 ± 1.68 vs 20.62 ± 1.85 ppb, p = 0.001 and 4.42 ± 0.40 vs 3.09±0.32 ppb, p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Spirometry and bronchodilation have an insignificant effect on FeNO and JawNO. Even if a slight change occurs in FeNO and JawNO, this does not modify clinician's decision and therapeutic strategy. CANO values (CANO1) are significantly decreased 20 min after spirometry and bronchodilation.

Key concepts: Bronchodilation, Spirometry, Exhaled nitric oxide, Medicine, Asthma, Bronchodilatation, Exhalation, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effect of bronchodilation and spirometry on fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO50), bronchial NO flux (JawNO) and alveolar NO concentration (CANO) in children and young adults — Research Paper | ScholarLens