2001•Unpublished venueRequires access

Minor Powers, Alliances, and Armed Conflict: Some Preliminary Patterns

Volker Krause, J. David Singer

Open publisher page 30 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review research on formal alliances, with a focus on alliance policies of so-called “minor powers,” often also referred to as “small states.” Specifically, we will address the following two questions: First, what are some sources of minor-power alliance commitments? Or, what are some benefits minor powers can expect from formal alliance ties? Second, what are some consequences of minor-power alliance commitments in terms of armed conflict? Or, are minor powers with formal alliance connections more or less likely than those without such bonds to become involved in militarized disputes and wars? Before dealing with these particular questions, we will first define minor powers and alliances by distinguishing the former from major powers and the latter from alignments and coalitions. Here we will also differentiate briefly between collective defense and collective security.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this article is to review research on formal alliances, with a focus on alliance policies of so-called “minor powers,” often also referred to as “small states.” Specifically, we will address the following two questions: First, what are some sources of minor-power alliance commitments? Or, what are some benefits minor powers can expect from formal alliance ties? Second, what are some consequences of minor-power alliance commitments in terms of armed conflict? Or, are minor powers with formal alliance connections more or less likely than those without such bonds to become involved in militarized disputes and wars? Before dealing with these particular questions, we will first define minor powers and alliances by distinguishing the former from major powers and the latter from alignments and coalitions. Here we will also differentiate briefly between collective defense and collective security.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this article is to review research on formal alliances, with a focus on alliance policies of so-called “minor powers,” often also referred to as “small states.” Specifically, we will address the following two questions: First, what are some sources of minor-power alliance commitments? Or, what are some benefits minor powers can expect from formal alliance ties? Second, what are some consequences of minor-power alliance commitments in terms of armed conflict? Or, are minor powers with formal alliance connections more or less likely than those without such bonds to become involved in militarized disputes and wars? Before dealing with these particular questions, we will first define minor powers and alliances by distinguishing the former from major powers and the latter from alignments and coalitions. Here we will also differentiate briefly between collective defense and collective security.

Key concepts: Minor (academic), Alliance, Political science, Collective security, Power (physics), Law and economics, Political economy, Computer security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Minor Powers, Alliances, and Armed Conflict: Some Preliminary Patterns — Research Paper | ScholarLens