2017•Lund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University)Requires access

Do Property Rights matter for China's Private Sector? A Panel Data Analysis, 1997-2007

Hana Cetina

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the ambiguous property rights in China and if they affect the private sector development. The indicators for property rights include both broader property rights and intellectual property rights. The property rights theory offers a perspective as a fundamental component of a market economy to enable a growth of private enterprises. The incentives and constraints offered by the property rights regime is determining the outcome of how enterprises are performing and operating. Yet in China there has been a rapid development of the private sector, while the property rights stay inadequate. The private sector which is the dependent variable is measured by employment of private enterprises. The sample consists of 275 observations and is conducted cross-provincial with 25 Chinese provinces to examine the various contents of property rights regime and the private sector development. The data is collected from several Provincial Statistical Yearbooks, available at Chinese Statistical Database. A fixed effect model is performed, covering 10 years from 1997 to 2007. The main finding is that the four municipalities are at forefront driving the effect of intellectual property rights on size of the private sector while broader property rights does not have an effect. This implies that private firms find intellectual property rights protection essential when production is high-tech and innovative activities are prioritised. Other private firms find informal substitutions for weaker property rights.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper examines the ambiguous property rights in China and if they affect the private sector development. The indicators for property rights include both broader property rights and intellectual property rights. The property rights theory offers a perspective as a fundamental component of a market economy to enable a growth of private enterprises. The incentives and constraints offered by the property rights regime is determining the outcome of how enterprises are performing and operating. Yet in China there has been a rapid development of the private sector, while the property rights stay inadequate. The private sector which is the dependent variable is measured by employment of private enterprises. The sample consists of 275 observations and is conducted cross-provincial with 25 Chinese provinces to examine the various contents of property rights regime and the private sector development. The data is collected from several Provincial Statistical Yearbooks, available at Chinese Statistical Database. A fixed effect model is performed, covering 10 years from 1997 to 2007. The main finding is that the four municipalities are at forefront driving the effect of intellectual property rights on size of the private sector while broader property rights does not have an effect. This implies that private firms find intellectual property rights protection essential when production is high-tech and innovative activities are prioritised. Other private firms find informal substitutions for weaker property rights.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper examines the ambiguous property rights in China and if they affect the private sector development. The indicators for property rights include both broader property rights and intellectual property rights. The property rights theory offers a perspective as a fundamental component of a market economy to enable a growth of private enterprises. The incentives and constraints offered by the property rights regime is determining the outcome of how enterprises are performing and operating. Yet in China there has been a rapid development of the private sector, while the property rights stay inadequate. The private sector which is the dependent variable is measured by employment of private enterprises. The sample consists of 275 observations and is conducted cross-provincial with 25 Chinese provinces to examine the various contents of property rights regime and the private sector development. The data is collected from several Provincial Statistical Yearbooks, available at Chinese Statistical Database. A fixed effect model is performed, covering 10 years from 1997 to 2007. The main finding is that the four municipalities are at forefront driving the effect of intellectual property rights on size of the private sector while broader property rights does not have an effect. This implies that private firms find intellectual property rights protection essential when production is high-tech and innovative activities are prioritised. Other private firms find informal substitutions for weaker property rights.

Key concepts: Intellectual property, Property rights, Private sector, Business, Incentive, China, Panel data, Private property

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Do Property Rights matter for China's Private Sector? A Panel Data Analysis, 1997-2007 — Research Paper | ScholarLens