Dynamic Pressure Transducer Calibration – Traceable?
Thomas Platte, Martin Iwanczik, Michael Mende
Abstract
Open-access reader
Thomas Platte, Martin Iwanczik, Michael Mende
Abstract
Open-access reader
Pressure transducers are mainly used for dynamic measurements but calibrated by means of static calibration methods. The reason is that neither a standardized method for a traceable dynamic secondary calibration of pressure transducers nor a primary dynamic calibration method for reference pressure transducers is available. The only exceptions are the calibration methods for pressure field microphones which can also be regarded as dynamic air pressure transducers for the low pressure range. This paper compares results from measurements with two different pressure exciters that have their origin in acoustics and were used for calibration of two types of pressure transducers in the frequency range 31.5 Hz to about 1 kHz at pressure amplitudes up to some 100 Pa. In both cases, a traceably calibrated pressure microphone was used as reference sensor that should provide a traceability of the pressure transducer calibration. The paper discusses the pros and cons of both exciters and if this can be considered as a traceable calibration method.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Pressure transducers are mainly used for dynamic measurements but calibrated by means of static calibration methods. The reason is that neither a standardized method for a traceable dynamic secondary calibration of pressure transducers nor a primary dynamic calibration method for reference pressure transducers is available. The only exceptions are the calibration methods for pressure field microphones which can also be regarded as dynamic air pressure transducers for the low pressure range. This paper compares results from measurements with two different pressure exciters that have their origin in acoustics and were used for calibration of two types of pressure transducers in the frequency range 31.5 Hz to about 1 kHz at pressure amplitudes up to some 100 Pa. In both cases, a traceably calibrated pressure microphone was used as reference sensor that should provide a traceability of the pressure transducer calibration. The paper discusses the pros and cons of both exciters and if this can be considered as a traceable calibration method.
Key concepts: Calibration, Transducer, Acoustics, Pressure sensor, Microphone, Traceability, Pressure measurement, Dynamic range