2017Unpublished venueRequires access

The Scour Bridge Simulation around a Cylindrical Pier Using Flow-3D

Mehdi Ghasemi, Somayeh Soltani-Gerdefaramarzi

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

Scour simulation is a way to prevent a bridge against the possible major damages.  In this study, local scouring around a cylindrical pier in non-cohesive bed sediment was simulated with the aid of Flow-3D model capabilities. A rectangular channel with 0.4 m width and 1.0 m length and a vertical cylindrical pier with diameter of 0.03 m and height of 0.3 m were specified for simulation of scour depth. Simulations were performed at different flow rates of 5, 10, 19 and 30 L/sec., separately and parameters of flow velocity, fluid depth, Froude number, packed sediment height and changes in net sediment motion were investigated. According to the results obtained from the simulations and after 600 sec., maximum scour depths for different inflow rates were equal to 0.0, 1.3, 2.4 and 3.6 cm for 5, 10, 19 and 30 L/sec., respectively. It was also observed that the scour depth was comparatively higher in upstream while it was lower in downstream part of the pier. Comparisons between the simulated and observed scour depths, however, showed underestimates of 30% to 20% for upper and lower parts of the pier, respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Scour simulation is a way to prevent a bridge against the possible major damages.  In this study, local scouring around a cylindrical pier in non-cohesive bed sediment was simulated with the aid of Flow-3D model capabilities. A rectangular channel with 0.4 m width and 1.0 m length and a vertical cylindrical pier with diameter of 0.03 m and height of 0.3 m were specified for simulation of scour depth. Simulations were performed at different flow rates of 5, 10, 19 and 30 L/sec., separately and parameters of flow velocity, fluid depth, Froude number, packed sediment height and changes in net sediment motion were investigated. According to the results obtained from the simulations and after 600 sec., maximum scour depths for different inflow rates were equal to 0.0, 1.3, 2.4 and 3.6 cm for 5, 10, 19 and 30 L/sec., respectively. It was also observed that the scour depth was comparatively higher in upstream while it was lower in downstream part of the pier. Comparisons between the simulated and observed scour depths, however, showed underestimates of 30% to 20% for upper and lower parts of the pier, respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Scour simulation is a way to prevent a bridge against the possible major damages.  In this study, local scouring around a cylindrical pier in non-cohesive bed sediment was simulated with the aid of Flow-3D model capabilities. A rectangular channel with 0.4 m width and 1.0 m length and a vertical cylindrical pier with diameter of 0.03 m and height of 0.3 m were specified for simulation of scour depth. Simulations were performed at different flow rates of 5, 10, 19 and 30 L/sec., separately and parameters of flow velocity, fluid depth, Froude number, packed sediment height and changes in net sediment motion were investigated. According to the results obtained from the simulations and after 600 sec., maximum scour depths for different inflow rates were equal to 0.0, 1.3, 2.4 and 3.6 cm for 5, 10, 19 and 30 L/sec., respectively. It was also observed that the scour depth was comparatively higher in upstream while it was lower in downstream part of the pier. Comparisons between the simulated and observed scour depths, however, showed underestimates of 30% to 20% for upper and lower parts of the pier, respectively.

Key concepts: Pier, Froude number, Geotechnical engineering, Geology, Flow (mathematics), Inflow, Sediment, Flow velocity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Scour Bridge Simulation around a Cylindrical Pier Using Flow-3D — Research Paper | ScholarLens