2017•DEStech Transactions on Social Science Education and Human ScienceRequires access

On the Relationship between Damage Compensation and Default

Lu Liu, Xiaozhen Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Compensation for breach of contract is the most important and most widely used form of liability for breach of contract, is one of the core content of the whole contract legal system. The research on the compensation for breach of contract is of great significance. This system is an important measure to ensure the full and accurate performance of the contract obligations. However, the general principles of liability for breach of contract damages, the principle of liability, the elements and whether to deal with non-property damage compensation has been controversial, the new contract law after the implementation of the problem still exists. It should be clear that the general principle of compensation for breach of contract is to fill the damage, the principle of liability should be consistent with the principle of liability for breach of contract, non-property damage clearly compensation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Compensation for breach of contract is the most important and most widely used form of liability for breach of contract, is one of the core content of the whole contract legal system. The research on the compensation for breach of contract is of great significance. This system is an important measure to ensure the full and accurate performance of the contract obligations. However, the general principles of liability for breach of contract damages, the principle of liability, the elements and whether to deal with non-property damage compensation has been controversial, the new contract law after the implementation of the problem still exists. It should be clear that the general principle of compensation for breach of contract is to fill the damage, the principle of liability should be consistent with the principle of liability for breach of contract, non-property damage clearly compensation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Compensation for breach of contract is the most important and most widely used form of liability for breach of contract, is one of the core content of the whole contract legal system. The research on the compensation for breach of contract is of great significance. This system is an important measure to ensure the full and accurate performance of the contract obligations. However, the general principles of liability for breach of contract damages, the principle of liability, the elements and whether to deal with non-property damage compensation has been controversial, the new contract law after the implementation of the problem still exists. It should be clear that the general principle of compensation for breach of contract is to fill the damage, the principle of liability should be consistent with the principle of liability for breach of contract, non-property damage clearly compensation.

Key concepts: Breach of contract, Compensation (psychology), Damages, Liability, Business, Strict liability, Exclusion clause, Property (philosophy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Relationship between Damage Compensation and Default — Research Paper | ScholarLens