2017Journal of Clinical PsychologyOpen access

50 years of rational‐emotive and cognitive‐behavioral therapy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Daniel David, Carmen Coteț, Silviu Matu, Cristina Mogoaşe, Simona Ștefan

Open full text 181 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT), introduced by Albert Ellis in the late 1950s, is one of the main pillars of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Existing reviews on REBT are overdue by 10 years or more. We aimed to summarize the effectiveness and efficacy of REBT since its beginnings and investigate the alleged mechanisms of change. METHOD: Systematic search identified 84 articles, out of which 68 provided data for between-group analyses and 39 for within-group analyses. RESULTS: We found a medium effect size of REBT compared to other interventions on outcomes (d = 0.58) and on irrational beliefs (d = 0.70), at posttest. For the within-group analyses, we obtained medium effects for both outcomes (d = 0.56) and irrational beliefs (d = 0.61). Several significant moderators emerged. CONCLUSION: REBT is a sound psychological intervention. Directions for future studies are outlined, stemming from the limitations of existing ones.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT), introduced by Albert Ellis in the late 1950s, is one of the main pillars of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Existing reviews on REBT are overdue by 10 years or more. We aimed to summarize the effectiveness and efficacy of REBT since its beginnings and investigate the alleged mechanisms of change. METHOD: Systematic search identified 84 articles, out of which 68 provided data for between-group analyses and 39 for within-group analyses. RESULTS: We found a medium effect size of REBT compared to other interventions on outcomes (d = 0.58) and on irrational beliefs (d = 0.70), at posttest. For the within-group analyses, we obtained medium effects for both outcomes (d = 0.56) and irrational beliefs (d = 0.61). Several significant moderators emerged. CONCLUSION: REBT is a sound psychological intervention. Directions for future studies are outlined, stemming from the limitations of existing ones.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 181 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT), introduced by Albert Ellis in the late 1950s, is one of the main pillars of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Existing reviews on REBT are overdue by 10 years or more. We aimed to summarize the effectiveness and efficacy of REBT since its beginnings and investigate the alleged mechanisms of change. METHOD: Systematic search identified 84 articles, out of which 68 provided data for between-group analyses and 39 for within-group analyses. RESULTS: We found a medium effect size of REBT compared to other interventions on outcomes (d = 0.58) and on irrational beliefs (d = 0.70), at posttest. For the within-group analyses, we obtained medium effects for both outcomes (d = 0.56) and irrational beliefs (d = 0.61). Several significant moderators emerged. CONCLUSION: REBT is a sound psychological intervention. Directions for future studies are outlined, stemming from the limitations of existing ones.

Key concepts: Psychology, Rational emotive behavior therapy, Psychotherapist, Irrational number, Meta-analysis, Cognition, Clinical psychology, Psychological intervention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
50 years of rational‐emotive and cognitive‐behavioral therapy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens