2017•International Journal of CrashworthinessRequires access

Comparison of response variation of THOR and Hybrid III dummy Models in a controlled rollover impact model

Stephen A. Ridella, Cezary Bojanowski

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Several dynamic rollover test procedures have been developed over the years; however, the repeatability of test results is often questioned. Also, there can be sensitivity of test and simulation results to small variations in the initial conditions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the response variation of three different crash dummy finite element (FE) models (two versions of a 50th percentile male Hybrid III (HIII) and a Test Device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR) dummy) in a simulation of a controlled rollover test, using a late model vehicle FE model. A baseline model was established with each dummy, and then a global sensitivity analysis was performed for each dummy varying vehicle design and crash parameters. The simplified HIII dummy model was very sensitive to small variations in the initial conditions of the test. Both the THOR and detailed HIII models gave very consistent results presenting similar trends in the sensitivity analysis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several dynamic rollover test procedures have been developed over the years; however, the repeatability of test results is often questioned. Also, there can be sensitivity of test and simulation results to small variations in the initial conditions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the response variation of three different crash dummy finite element (FE) models (two versions of a 50th percentile male Hybrid III (HIII) and a Test Device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR) dummy) in a simulation of a controlled rollover test, using a late model vehicle FE model. A baseline model was established with each dummy, and then a global sensitivity analysis was performed for each dummy varying vehicle design and crash parameters. The simplified HIII dummy model was very sensitive to small variations in the initial conditions of the test. Both the THOR and detailed HIII models gave very consistent results presenting similar trends in the sensitivity analysis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several dynamic rollover test procedures have been developed over the years; however, the repeatability of test results is often questioned. Also, there can be sensitivity of test and simulation results to small variations in the initial conditions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the response variation of three different crash dummy finite element (FE) models (two versions of a 50th percentile male Hybrid III (HIII) and a Test Device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR) dummy) in a simulation of a controlled rollover test, using a late model vehicle FE model. A baseline model was established with each dummy, and then a global sensitivity analysis was performed for each dummy varying vehicle design and crash parameters. The simplified HIII dummy model was very sensitive to small variations in the initial conditions of the test. Both the THOR and detailed HIII models gave very consistent results presenting similar trends in the sensitivity analysis.

Key concepts: Rollover (web design), Hybrid III, Repeatability, Sensitivity (control systems), Crash, Crashworthiness, Percentile, Poison control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of response variation of THOR and Hybrid III dummy Models in a controlled rollover impact model — Research Paper | ScholarLens