Functions and perspectives of the right to be forgotten by a search engine
Matija Miloš
Abstract
Matija Miloš
Abstract
In May 2014 the European Court of Justice ruled on a preliminary reference in Google Spain SL. In its decision, the Court defines search engine providers as “data controllers”, obligating them to enforce a “right to be forgotten”. In a nutshell: individuals may ask for the removal of personal data listed in the results of an internet search based on their name and surname. This paper analyses the functions and wider implications of this right to alter search engine results. As for its functions, I outline the ways in which the right to be forgotten enforces the ability to decide on the formation of one’s digital identity. I then proceed to look at the implications of the right to be forgotten in the context of the current discourse on the “European internet governance”. In this respect, I find that the effects of the right to be forgotten are wider than the boundaries of the EU and its governance, but that they at the same time depend on the capacities of national administrative systems.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In May 2014 the European Court of Justice ruled on a preliminary reference in Google Spain SL. In its decision, the Court defines search engine providers as “data controllers”, obligating them to enforce a “right to be forgotten”. In a nutshell: individuals may ask for the removal of personal data listed in the results of an internet search based on their name and surname. This paper analyses the functions and wider implications of this right to alter search engine results. As for its functions, I outline the ways in which the right to be forgotten enforces the ability to decide on the formation of one’s digital identity. I then proceed to look at the implications of the right to be forgotten in the context of the current discourse on the “European internet governance”. In this respect, I find that the effects of the right to be forgotten are wider than the boundaries of the EU and its governance, but that they at the same time depend on the capacities of national administrative systems.
Key concepts: Right to be forgotten, The Internet, Context (archaeology), Corporate governance, Political science, Economic Justice, Identity (music), Internet privacy