2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Functions and perspectives of the right to be forgotten by a search engine

Matija Miloš

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In May 2014 the European Court of Justice ruled on a preliminary reference in Google Spain SL. In its decision, the Court defines search engine providers as “data controllers”, obligating them to enforce a “right to be forgotten”. In a nutshell: individuals may ask for the removal of personal data listed in the results of an internet search based on their name and surname. This paper analyses the functions and wider implications of this right to alter search engine results. As for its functions, I outline the ways in which the right to be forgotten enforces the ability to decide on the formation of one’s digital identity. I then proceed to look at the implications of the right to be forgotten in the context of the current discourse on the “European internet governance”. In this respect, I find that the effects of the right to be forgotten are wider than the boundaries of the EU and its governance, but that they at the same time depend on the capacities of national administrative systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In May 2014 the European Court of Justice ruled on a preliminary reference in Google Spain SL. In its decision, the Court defines search engine providers as “data controllers”, obligating them to enforce a “right to be forgotten”. In a nutshell: individuals may ask for the removal of personal data listed in the results of an internet search based on their name and surname. This paper analyses the functions and wider implications of this right to alter search engine results. As for its functions, I outline the ways in which the right to be forgotten enforces the ability to decide on the formation of one’s digital identity. I then proceed to look at the implications of the right to be forgotten in the context of the current discourse on the “European internet governance”. In this respect, I find that the effects of the right to be forgotten are wider than the boundaries of the EU and its governance, but that they at the same time depend on the capacities of national administrative systems.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In May 2014 the European Court of Justice ruled on a preliminary reference in Google Spain SL. In its decision, the Court defines search engine providers as “data controllers”, obligating them to enforce a “right to be forgotten”. In a nutshell: individuals may ask for the removal of personal data listed in the results of an internet search based on their name and surname. This paper analyses the functions and wider implications of this right to alter search engine results. As for its functions, I outline the ways in which the right to be forgotten enforces the ability to decide on the formation of one’s digital identity. I then proceed to look at the implications of the right to be forgotten in the context of the current discourse on the “European internet governance”. In this respect, I find that the effects of the right to be forgotten are wider than the boundaries of the EU and its governance, but that they at the same time depend on the capacities of national administrative systems.

Key concepts: Right to be forgotten, The Internet, Context (archaeology), Corporate governance, Political science, Economic Justice, Identity (music), Internet privacy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Functions and perspectives of the right to be forgotten by a search engine — Research Paper | ScholarLens