2017Radiation OncologyOpen access

Target volume delineation of anal cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography

Espen Rusten, B.L. Rekstad, Christine Undseth, Ghazwan Al-Haidari, Bettina Hanekamp, Eivor Hernes, Taran Paulsen Hellebust, Eirik Malinen, Marianne G. Guren

Open full text 26 citations

Abstract

To compare target volume delineation of anal cancer using positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with respect to inter-observer and inter-modality variability. Nineteen patients with anal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy were prospectively included. Planning computed tomography (CT) images were co-registered with 18F–fluorodexocyglucose (FDG) PET/CT images and T2 and diffusion weighted (DW) MR images. Three oncologists delineated the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) according to national guidelines and the visible tumor tissue (GTV T ). MRI and PET based delineations were evaluated by absolute volumes and Dice similarity coefficients. The median volume of the GTVs was 27 and 31 cm 3 for PET and MRI, respectively, while it was 6 and 11 cm 3 for GTV T . Both GTV and GTV T volumes were highly correlated between delineators ( r = 0.90 and r = 0.96, respectively). The median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.75 when comparing the GTVs based on PET/CT (GTV PET ) with the GTVs based on MRI and CT (GTV MRI ). The median Dice coefficient was 0.56 when comparing the visible tumor volume evaluated by PET (GTV T_PET ) with the same volume evaluated by MRI (GTV T_MRI ). Margins of 1–2 mm in the axial plane and 7–8 mm in superoinferior direction were required for coverage of the individual observer’s GTVs. The rather good agreement between PET- and MRI-based GTVs indicates that either modality may be used for standard target delineation of anal cancer. However, larger deviations were found for GTV T , which may impact future tumor boost strategies.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To compare target volume delineation of anal cancer using positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with respect to inter-observer and inter-modality variability. Nineteen patients with anal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy were prospectively included. Planning computed tomography (CT) images were co-registered with 18F–fluorodexocyglucose (FDG) PET/CT images and T2 and diffusion weighted (DW) MR images. Three oncologists delineated the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) according to national guidelines and the visible tumor tissue (GTV T ). MRI and PET based delineations were evaluated by absolute volumes and Dice similarity coefficients. The median volume of the GTVs was 27 and 31 cm 3 for PET and MRI, respectively, while it was 6 and 11 cm 3 for GTV T . Both GTV and GTV T volumes were highly correlated between delineators ( r = 0.90 and r = 0.96, respectively). The median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.75 when comparing the GTVs based on PET/CT (GTV PET ) with the GTVs based on MRI and CT (GTV MRI ). The median Dice coefficient was 0.56 when comparing the visible tumor volume evaluated by PET (GTV T_PET ) with the same volume evaluated by MRI (GTV T_MRI ). Margins of 1–2 mm in the axial plane and 7–8 mm in superoinferior direction were required for coverage of the individual observer’s GTVs. The rather good agreement between PET- and MRI-based GTVs indicates that either modality may be used for standard target delineation of anal cancer. However, larger deviations were found for GTV T , which may impact future tumor boost strategies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To compare target volume delineation of anal cancer using positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with respect to inter-observer and inter-modality variability. Nineteen patients with anal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy were prospectively included. Planning computed tomography (CT) images were co-registered with 18F–fluorodexocyglucose (FDG) PET/CT images and T2 and diffusion weighted (DW) MR images. Three oncologists delineated the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) according to national guidelines and the visible tumor tissue (GTV T ). MRI and PET based delineations were evaluated by absolute volumes and Dice similarity coefficients. The median volume of the GTVs was 27 and 31 cm 3 for PET and MRI, respectively, while it was 6 and 11 cm 3 for GTV T . Both GTV and GTV T volumes were highly correlated between delineators ( r = 0.90 and r = 0.96, respectively). The median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.75 when comparing the GTVs based on PET/CT (GTV PET ) with the GTVs based on MRI and CT (GTV MRI ). The median Dice coefficient was 0.56 when comparing the visible tumor volume evaluated by PET (GTV T_PET ) with the same volume evaluated by MRI (GTV T_MRI ). Margins of 1–2 mm in the axial plane and 7–8 mm in superoinferior direction were required for coverage of the individual observer’s GTVs. The rather good agreement between PET- and MRI-based GTVs indicates that either modality may be used for standard target delineation of anal cancer. However, larger deviations were found for GTV T , which may impact future tumor boost strategies.

Key concepts: Medicine, Magnetic resonance imaging, Positron emission tomography, Nuclear medicine, Tomography, Effective diffusion coefficient, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Target volume delineation of anal cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography — Research Paper | ScholarLens