2017International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied SciencesOpen access

Comparative Study of Conventional Staining Techniques, Quantitative Buffy Coat, Immunochromatography Methods and Molecular Methods (Gene Amplification) for Diagnosis of Malaria

Kasi Seshu Vaisakhi, Sujatha Kolla, Achut Rao

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The study showed that the immunochromatography assay tests were reliable and easy to use. Blood samples were collected from 175 patients presenting with typical features suggesting clinical malaria. These blood samples were subjected to various test which included thin and thick smears stained with JSB, Giemsa, Leishman, Fields stain and the other methods employed which included Arcidine orange staining, Quantitative Buffy Coat methods, immunochromatography strips – optimal and para HIT – f. Assay are used. Gene amplification technique (Polymerase chain reaction) was used. However, RDTS are more suited for investigator / health workers in situations where health services are different (or) absent. RDT’s in conjunction with microscopy should improve diagnosis of malaria, thus likely to contribute greatly to an effective control of malaria in resource poor countries.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The study showed that the immunochromatography assay tests were reliable and easy to use. Blood samples were collected from 175 patients presenting with typical features suggesting clinical malaria. These blood samples were subjected to various test which included thin and thick smears stained with JSB, Giemsa, Leishman, Fields stain and the other methods employed which included Arcidine orange staining, Quantitative Buffy Coat methods, immunochromatography strips – optimal and para HIT – f. Assay are used. Gene amplification technique (Polymerase chain reaction) was used. However, RDTS are more suited for investigator / health workers in situations where health services are different (or) absent. RDT’s in conjunction with microscopy should improve diagnosis of malaria, thus likely to contribute greatly to an effective control of malaria in resource poor countries.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The study showed that the immunochromatography assay tests were reliable and easy to use. Blood samples were collected from 175 patients presenting with typical features suggesting clinical malaria. These blood samples were subjected to various test which included thin and thick smears stained with JSB, Giemsa, Leishman, Fields stain and the other methods employed which included Arcidine orange staining, Quantitative Buffy Coat methods, immunochromatography strips – optimal and para HIT – f. Assay are used. Gene amplification technique (Polymerase chain reaction) was used. However, RDTS are more suited for investigator / health workers in situations where health services are different (or) absent. RDT’s in conjunction with microscopy should improve diagnosis of malaria, thus likely to contribute greatly to an effective control of malaria in resource poor countries.

Key concepts: Buffy coat, Giemsa stain, Malaria, Diagnosis of malaria, Staining, Medicine, Stain, Virology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Study of Conventional Staining Techniques, Quantitative Buffy Coat, Immunochromatography Methods and Molecular Methods (Gene Amplification) for Diagnosis of Malaria — Research Paper | ScholarLens