2017•Zeitschrift für GastroenterologieRequires access

Spleen stiffness is positively correlated with HVPG and decreases significantly after TIPS implantation

Matthias Buechter, A Kahraman, Alexander Dechêne, Paul Manka, Jens Matthias Theysohn, Marcus Paul Reinboldt, Aygün Canbay, G Gerken

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Background: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is considered the gold standard for portal hypertension (PH) assessment. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is indicated in patients with decompensated PH and refractory ascites and/or variceal bleeding. Because HVPG measurement is an invasive procedure, non-invasive methods for evaluating the severity of PH are warranted. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively correlated the spleen stiffness as measured by FibroScan with the HVPG in patients who underwent TIPS implantation at the University Hospital Essen between 2015 and 2017. Twenty-four patients from whom valuable spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) was obtained one day before (D-1), one day after (D+1) and 28 days after TIPS placement (D+28) were included in this study. Results: SSM was positively correlated with HVPG (HVPG < 13 mmHg, median SSM: 19.7 ± 8.6 [10.7 – 39.2] kPa; HVPG 13 – 24 mmHg, median SSM: 45.0 ± 15.7 [20.9 – 75.0] kPa; HVPG > 24 mmHg, median SSM: 75.0 ± 6.2 [56.1 – 75.0] kPa; p < 0.05]; r 2 = 0.72; p < 0.001) and decreased significantly after TIPS implantation (D-1, median SSM: 67.1 ± 17.3 [20.9 – 75.0] kPa; D+1, median SSM: 44.7 ± 18.5 [18.8 – 75.0] kPa; D+28, median SSM: 35.6 ± 17.0 [12.2 – 75.0] kPa; p < 0.05), while liver stiffness measurement (LSM) decreased likewise, however without statistical significance (D-1, median LSM: 72.0 ± 26.0 [9.9 – 75.0] kPa; D+1, median LSM: 51.1 ± 23.0 [4.5.-75.0] kPa; D+28, median LSM: 38.5 ± 20.8 [5.7 – 75.0] kPa; p = n.s.). Conclusions: The present study highlights the possibility of using SSM as a clinically relevant non-invasive tool in patients with chronic liver disease suggesting direct positive correlation between spleen stiffness and degree of portal hypertension. This observation is confirmed by a significant decrease of spleen stiffness after TIPS implantation offering a confirmable additional parameter in the surveillance of patients undergoing TIPS procedure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is considered the gold standard for portal hypertension (PH) assessment. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is indicated in patients with decompensated PH and refractory ascites and/or variceal bleeding. Because HVPG measurement is an invasive procedure, non-invasive methods for evaluating the severity of PH are warranted. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively correlated the spleen stiffness as measured by FibroScan with the HVPG in patients who underwent TIPS implantation at the University Hospital Essen between 2015 and 2017. Twenty-four patients from whom valuable spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) was obtained one day before (D-1), one day after (D+1) and 28 days after TIPS placement (D+28) were included in this study. Results: SSM was positively correlated with HVPG (HVPG < 13 mmHg, median SSM: 19.7 ± 8.6 [10.7 – 39.2] kPa; HVPG 13 – 24 mmHg, median SSM: 45.0 ± 15.7 [20.9 – 75.0] kPa; HVPG > 24 mmHg, median SSM: 75.0 ± 6.2 [56.1 – 75.0] kPa; p < 0.05]; r 2 = 0.72; p < 0.001) and decreased significantly after TIPS implantation (D-1, median SSM: 67.1 ± 17.3 [20.9 – 75.0] kPa; D+1, median SSM: 44.7 ± 18.5 [18.8 – 75.0] kPa; D+28, median SSM: 35.6 ± 17.0 [12.2 – 75.0] kPa; p < 0.05), while liver stiffness measurement (LSM) decreased likewise, however without statistical significance (D-1, median LSM: 72.0 ± 26.0 [9.9 – 75.0] kPa; D+1, median LSM: 51.1 ± 23.0 [4.5.-75.0] kPa; D+28, median LSM: 38.5 ± 20.8 [5.7 – 75.0] kPa; p = n.s.). Conclusions: The present study highlights the possibility of using SSM as a clinically relevant non-invasive tool in patients with chronic liver disease suggesting direct positive correlation between spleen stiffness and degree of portal hypertension. This observation is confirmed by a significant decrease of spleen stiffness after TIPS implantation offering a confirmable additional parameter in the surveillance of patients undergoing TIPS procedure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is considered the gold standard for portal hypertension (PH) assessment. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is indicated in patients with decompensated PH and refractory ascites and/or variceal bleeding. Because HVPG measurement is an invasive procedure, non-invasive methods for evaluating the severity of PH are warranted. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively correlated the spleen stiffness as measured by FibroScan with the HVPG in patients who underwent TIPS implantation at the University Hospital Essen between 2015 and 2017. Twenty-four patients from whom valuable spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) was obtained one day before (D-1), one day after (D+1) and 28 days after TIPS placement (D+28) were included in this study. Results: SSM was positively correlated with HVPG (HVPG < 13 mmHg, median SSM: 19.7 ± 8.6 [10.7 – 39.2] kPa; HVPG 13 – 24 mmHg, median SSM: 45.0 ± 15.7 [20.9 – 75.0] kPa; HVPG > 24 mmHg, median SSM: 75.0 ± 6.2 [56.1 – 75.0] kPa; p < 0.05]; r 2 = 0.72; p < 0.001) and decreased significantly after TIPS implantation (D-1, median SSM: 67.1 ± 17.3 [20.9 – 75.0] kPa; D+1, median SSM: 44.7 ± 18.5 [18.8 – 75.0] kPa; D+28, median SSM: 35.6 ± 17.0 [12.2 – 75.0] kPa; p < 0.05), while liver stiffness measurement (LSM) decreased likewise, however without statistical significance (D-1, median LSM: 72.0 ± 26.0 [9.9 – 75.0] kPa; D+1, median LSM: 51.1 ± 23.0 [4.5.-75.0] kPa; D+28, median LSM: 38.5 ± 20.8 [5.7 – 75.0] kPa; p = n.s.). Conclusions: The present study highlights the possibility of using SSM as a clinically relevant non-invasive tool in patients with chronic liver disease suggesting direct positive correlation between spleen stiffness and degree of portal hypertension. This observation is confirmed by a significant decrease of spleen stiffness after TIPS implantation offering a confirmable additional parameter in the surveillance of patients undergoing TIPS procedure.

Key concepts: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, Portal venous pressure, Portal hypertension, Ascites, Medicine, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Portosystemic shunt

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spleen stiffness is positively correlated with HVPG and decreases significantly after TIPS implantation — Research Paper | ScholarLens