2017•Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

Çatalhöyük, Archaeology, Violence

Christopher J. Knüsel, Bonnie A. Glencross

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Issues of violence were, until recently, neglected in studies of the Neolithic. Evidence of conflict was not sought, and potentially linked finds were ascribed to a different (often ritualistic) cause or significance. René Girard’s perspective provides archaeologists with the opportunity to support a more literal reading of imagery with physical evidence that might support the mimetic thesis: that there is a relationship between violence and religion in the genesis and maintenance of culture. An outlet must be found to dissipate reprisal violence in human groups because, if left unchecked, reprisal violence resulting from desire of the same things, both materially and socially, would spiral out of control and threaten the stability and, ultimately, the continued existence of the social group, especially in earliest densely populated villages. The goal here is to present evidence based on the study of humans remains that support Girard’s thesis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Issues of violence were, until recently, neglected in studies of the Neolithic. Evidence of conflict was not sought, and potentially linked finds were ascribed to a different (often ritualistic) cause or significance. René Girard’s perspective provides archaeologists with the opportunity to support a more literal reading of imagery with physical evidence that might support the mimetic thesis: that there is a relationship between violence and religion in the genesis and maintenance of culture. An outlet must be found to dissipate reprisal violence in human groups because, if left unchecked, reprisal violence resulting from desire of the same things, both materially and socially, would spiral out of control and threaten the stability and, ultimately, the continued existence of the social group, especially in earliest densely populated villages. The goal here is to present evidence based on the study of humans remains that support Girard’s thesis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Issues of violence were, until recently, neglected in studies of the Neolithic. Evidence of conflict was not sought, and potentially linked finds were ascribed to a different (often ritualistic) cause or significance. René Girard’s perspective provides archaeologists with the opportunity to support a more literal reading of imagery with physical evidence that might support the mimetic thesis: that there is a relationship between violence and religion in the genesis and maintenance of culture. An outlet must be found to dissipate reprisal violence in human groups because, if left unchecked, reprisal violence resulting from desire of the same things, both materially and socially, would spiral out of control and threaten the stability and, ultimately, the continued existence of the social group, especially in earliest densely populated villages. The goal here is to present evidence based on the study of humans remains that support Girard’s thesis.

Key concepts: Perspective (graphical), Reading (process), Sociology, History, Criminology, Psychology, Environmental ethics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Çatalhöyük, Archaeology, Violence — Research Paper | ScholarLens