The state and society in the Iranian public sphere after the Islamic revolution
Hoshang Dara Hama Ameen
Abstract
Open-access reader
Hoshang Dara Hama Ameen
Abstract
Open-access reader
thesis is an attempt to understand the concept of the public sphere through applying it \nto the Islamic Republic of Iran. This requires understanding the era of the revolution of \ninformation and communication technology, as it has affected the structures of the Iranian \npublic sphere. It also aims to understand the Iranian public sphere after the Islamic \nRevolution of 1979. It tries to offer a complete picture of the Iranian public sphere, \nincluding its state and society. Here, both the concept of the public sphere and the Iranian \npublic sphere are being used in order to understand each other. \n \nThe concept of the public sphere, here, is understood as it covers all actions and reactions that occur in a country. Its contemporary model is one which greatly depends on the Internet and uses non-controllable freedoms. The aim is, therefore, to find out the nature of the Iranian public sphere after the Islamic Revolution and describe the role that the agents of both state and society play in the Iranian public sphere. \n \nTo collect and analyse data, updated documents and methods are used. Thus, the thesis \nhas used different resources including pictorial and online documents. Thematic analysis is used to analyse the collected data. It has partly been gained through online media \nobservation to collect data, and content and discourse analysis to analyse it. \n \nFinally, by showing reactivity inside the Iranian public sphere, this thesis suggests that nondemocratic regimes cannot disable the public sphere totally and also the public sphere can be active even under the hegemony of non-democratic powers. However, activity does not necessarily mean strength, as the Iranian public sphere can be considered as active but also weak. That is mainly because most of its activities are fruitless ones.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
thesis is an attempt to understand the concept of the public sphere through applying it \nto the Islamic Republic of Iran. This requires understanding the era of the revolution of \ninformation and communication technology, as it has affected the structures of the Iranian \npublic sphere. It also aims to understand the Iranian public sphere after the Islamic \nRevolution of 1979. It tries to offer a complete picture of the Iranian public sphere, \nincluding its state and society. Here, both the concept of the public sphere and the Iranian \npublic sphere are being used in order to understand each other. \n \nThe concept of the public sphere, here, is understood as it covers all actions and reactions that occur in a country. Its contemporary model is one which greatly depends on the Internet and uses non-controllable freedoms. The aim is, therefore, to find out the nature of the Iranian public sphere after the Islamic Revolution and describe the role that the agents of both state and society play in the Iranian public sphere. \n \nTo collect and analyse data, updated documents and methods are used. Thus, the thesis \nhas used different resources including pictorial and online documents. Thematic analysis is used to analyse the collected data. It has partly been gained through online media \nobservation to collect data, and content and discourse analysis to analyse it. \n \nFinally, by showing reactivity inside the Iranian public sphere, this thesis suggests that nondemocratic regimes cannot disable the public sphere totally and also the public sphere can be active even under the hegemony of non-democratic powers. However, activity does not necessarily mean strength, as the Iranian public sphere can be considered as active but also weak. That is mainly because most of its activities are fruitless ones.
Key concepts: Public sphere, Islam, State (computer science), Political science, Private sphere, Thematic analysis, Inner sphere electron transfer, Sociology