Reply to Comment on “Commercially Available WO3 Nanopowders for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Photocurrent versus Oxygen Evolution”
Markus Niederberger
Abstract
Markus Niederberger
Abstract
In this Reply, Niederberger responds to the Comment written by Augustynski and Solarska regarding the article entitled “Commercially Available WO3 Nanopowders for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Photocurrent versus Oxygen Evolution” (ChemPlusChem 2016, 81, 935–940).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this Reply, Niederberger responds to the Comment written by Augustynski and Solarska regarding the article entitled “Commercially Available WO3 Nanopowders for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Photocurrent versus Oxygen Evolution” (ChemPlusChem 2016, 81, 935–940).
Key concepts: Water splitting, Photocurrent, Oxygen evolution, Oxygen, Photoelectrochemical cell, Photoelectrochemistry, Materials science, Nanotechnology