2017ChemPlusChemRequires access

Reply to Comment on “Commercially Available WO3 Nanopowders for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Photocurrent versus Oxygen Evolution”

Markus Niederberger

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this Reply, Niederberger responds to the Comment written by Augustynski and Solarska regarding the article entitled “Commercially Available WO3 Nanopowders for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Photocurrent versus Oxygen Evolution” (ChemPlusChem 2016, 81, 935–940).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this Reply, Niederberger responds to the Comment written by Augustynski and Solarska regarding the article entitled “Commercially Available WO3 Nanopowders for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Photocurrent versus Oxygen Evolution” (ChemPlusChem 2016, 81, 935–940).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this Reply, Niederberger responds to the Comment written by Augustynski and Solarska regarding the article entitled “Commercially Available WO3 Nanopowders for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Photocurrent versus Oxygen Evolution” (ChemPlusChem 2016, 81, 935–940).

Key concepts: Water splitting, Photocurrent, Oxygen evolution, Oxygen, Photoelectrochemical cell, Photoelectrochemistry, Materials science, Nanotechnology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reply to Comment on “Commercially Available WO3 Nanopowders for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Photocurrent versus Oxygen Evolution” — Research Paper | ScholarLens