2017Journal of Medical Science And clinical ResearchOpen access

Diagnostic role of ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute abdomen

Dr Yash Pandey, Dr Yash Pandey

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of sonography in the evaluation of acute abdomen, given that it involves no ionizing radiation and excels in the depiction of acute gynaecologic conditions in young women, and during pregnancy.Clinical diagnosis is based primarily on symptoms and physical findings, but is often difficult to establish; up to 50% of patients hospitalized for possible appendicitis do not actually have this disorder Authors of large prospective studies report a 22-30% removal rate of normal appendices at surgery.Ultrasonography has established itself as an invaluable tool in surgery.In surgical practice, abdominal pain is perhaps the most common symptom encountered and almost in every case of abdominal pain surgeon prefers to use the ultrasound to confirm the diagnosis.Although physical examination of the patient is the most important part in proper diagnosis many a time some positive help is required in the form of investigations especially ultrasonography.Methods: This was a study of hundred patients carried out at a tertiary care hospital admitted with complaints of severe abdominal pain except those with a history of trauma or with a history of chronic abdominal pain.Clinical history, physical examination, ultrasonography, per operative findings and histopathological examination were used to come to a final conclusion.Result: In this study ultrasonography was diagnostic in 78% of patients.Two patients were misdiagnosed and in 20 patients other investigations were required for the confirmation of diagnosis.The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in diagnosing acute appendicitis, renal calculus, liver abscess, mesenteric lymphadenitis, acute pancreatitis and ovarian cyst was 100% and in calculus cholecystitis it was 93.75% and 100% respectively.Conclusion: Ultrasonography is superior in organ system imaging.It helps in showing organ specific lesions and its accurate measurement which is helpful in follow up and response to treatment.Ultrasonography is also helpful in diagnosing alternative disease and to reduce negative laparotomy rate.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of sonography in the evaluation of acute abdomen, given that it involves no ionizing radiation and excels in the depiction of acute gynaecologic conditions in young women, and during pregnancy.Clinical diagnosis is based primarily on symptoms and physical findings, but is often difficult to establish; up to 50% of patients hospitalized for possible appendicitis do not actually have this disorder Authors of large prospective studies report a 22-30% removal rate of normal appendices at surgery.Ultrasonography has established itself as an invaluable tool in surgery.In surgical practice, abdominal pain is perhaps the most common symptom encountered and almost in every case of abdominal pain surgeon prefers to use the ultrasound to confirm the diagnosis.Although physical examination of the patient is the most important part in proper diagnosis many a time some positive help is required in the form of investigations especially ultrasonography.Methods: This was a study of hundred patients carried out at a tertiary care hospital admitted with complaints of severe abdominal pain except those with a history of trauma or with a history of chronic abdominal pain.Clinical history, physical examination, ultrasonography, per operative findings and histopathological examination were used to come to a final conclusion.Result: In this study ultrasonography was diagnostic in 78% of patients.Two patients were misdiagnosed and in 20 patients other investigations were required for the confirmation of diagnosis.The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in diagnosing acute appendicitis, renal calculus, liver abscess, mesenteric lymphadenitis, acute pancreatitis and ovarian cyst was 100% and in calculus cholecystitis it was 93.75% and 100% respectively.Conclusion: Ultrasonography is superior in organ system imaging.It helps in showing organ specific lesions and its accurate measurement which is helpful in follow up and response to treatment.Ultrasonography is also helpful in diagnosing alternative disease and to reduce negative laparotomy rate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of sonography in the evaluation of acute abdomen, given that it involves no ionizing radiation and excels in the depiction of acute gynaecologic conditions in young women, and during pregnancy.Clinical diagnosis is based primarily on symptoms and physical findings, but is often difficult to establish; up to 50% of patients hospitalized for possible appendicitis do not actually have this disorder Authors of large prospective studies report a 22-30% removal rate of normal appendices at surgery.Ultrasonography has established itself as an invaluable tool in surgery.In surgical practice, abdominal pain is perhaps the most common symptom encountered and almost in every case of abdominal pain surgeon prefers to use the ultrasound to confirm the diagnosis.Although physical examination of the patient is the most important part in proper diagnosis many a time some positive help is required in the form of investigations especially ultrasonography.Methods: This was a study of hundred patients carried out at a tertiary care hospital admitted with complaints of severe abdominal pain except those with a history of trauma or with a history of chronic abdominal pain.Clinical history, physical examination, ultrasonography, per operative findings and histopathological examination were used to come to a final conclusion.Result: In this study ultrasonography was diagnostic in 78% of patients.Two patients were misdiagnosed and in 20 patients other investigations were required for the confirmation of diagnosis.The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in diagnosing acute appendicitis, renal calculus, liver abscess, mesenteric lymphadenitis, acute pancreatitis and ovarian cyst was 100% and in calculus cholecystitis it was 93.75% and 100% respectively.Conclusion: Ultrasonography is superior in organ system imaging.It helps in showing organ specific lesions and its accurate measurement which is helpful in follow up and response to treatment.Ultrasonography is also helpful in diagnosing alternative disease and to reduce negative laparotomy rate.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ultrasonography, Acute abdomen, Radiology, Abdomen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic role of ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute abdomen — Research Paper | ScholarLens