The Hidden Power of Social-Linkage in the Office
Horng‐Jinh Chang, Whe-Min Wang
Abstract
Horng‐Jinh Chang, Whe-Min Wang
Abstract
Social network analysis has developed for a long time; it is used to assess the performance of scholars, quantifying scholar's publication. Collaborations among scholars with different skills and backgrounds are shown on co-authors paper published. The argument is that the co-authorship network is compatible with social-linkage, and the hidden power embedded in the co-authorship network. We collected co-authorship data from 85 journal papers in the field of industrial and management science (IMS) with a time span of twenty years (1997-2016). A bibliometric network is constructed and UCINET 6 applied to calculate three centrality measures (out-degree, in-degree, and betweenness) for individual authors in this network. The results confirm our argument and the mechanism is discussed.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Social network analysis has developed for a long time; it is used to assess the performance of scholars, quantifying scholar's publication. Collaborations among scholars with different skills and backgrounds are shown on co-authors paper published. The argument is that the co-authorship network is compatible with social-linkage, and the hidden power embedded in the co-authorship network. We collected co-authorship data from 85 journal papers in the field of industrial and management science (IMS) with a time span of twenty years (1997-2016). A bibliometric network is constructed and UCINET 6 applied to calculate three centrality measures (out-degree, in-degree, and betweenness) for individual authors in this network. The results confirm our argument and the mechanism is discussed.
Key concepts: Betweenness centrality, Social network analysis, Linkage (software), Argument (complex analysis), Centrality, Social network (sociolinguistics), Computer science, Network analysis