2017•Journal of Animal ScienceRequires access

295 Feed processing affects palatability of ventenata-infested grass hay

Dana E. McCurdy, C. J. Watts, Gwinyai E Chibisa, Timothy S. Prather, A.H. Laarman

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Ventenata (Ventenata dubia) is an invasive grass species that infested rangelands in the inland Northwest, causing significant economic damage through declines in forage production. Despite its nutritional similarity to other forages such as cheatgrass in terms of CP content and NDF digestibility, its palatability for livestock is poor. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of texture and surface-bound microbes in determining palatability of ventenata-infested hay. Thirty-five weaned Charolais calves were separated into 5 treatments according to a taste-preference study that lasted for 7 d. Each animal had access to 2 feed bunks: one with a reference diet (mixed grass hay) and one with a treatment diet. The 5 treatments were the control, which was mixed grass hay used as the reference diet (CTRL); ventenata-infested hay (VENT); autoclaved mixed grass hay; autoclaved ventenata-infested hay; and pelleted ventenata-infested hay (PELT). Preference between mixed-grass hay and ventenata-infested hay was calculated such that 0% preference implies a total preference against the treatment diet, 50% preference implies an equal preference between mixed grass hay and ventenata-infested hay, and 100% preference implies a total preference for the treatment diet. Body weight gain was measured at the start and end of the experiment. Daily, intake of the reference diet and treatment diet were measured and percent preference was calculated. Among the 5 treatments, there was no difference in BW gain during the 7 d on treatment. The CTRL treatment showed no difference from 50% preference, indicating that our feed preference test worked. Calves on the VENT treatment had a preference of 19%, highlighting the poor palatability of ventenata-infested hay. Although autoclaving ventenata-infested hay made no difference to palatability, the PELT treatment increased preference to 50%, completely erasing the negative palatability of the ventenata-infested hay. Together, these results show the poor palatability of ventenata-infested hay may be due to texture of the hay and that ventenata's palatability can be improved through feed processing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ventenata (Ventenata dubia) is an invasive grass species that infested rangelands in the inland Northwest, causing significant economic damage through declines in forage production. Despite its nutritional similarity to other forages such as cheatgrass in terms of CP content and NDF digestibility, its palatability for livestock is poor. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of texture and surface-bound microbes in determining palatability of ventenata-infested hay. Thirty-five weaned Charolais calves were separated into 5 treatments according to a taste-preference study that lasted for 7 d. Each animal had access to 2 feed bunks: one with a reference diet (mixed grass hay) and one with a treatment diet. The 5 treatments were the control, which was mixed grass hay used as the reference diet (CTRL); ventenata-infested hay (VENT); autoclaved mixed grass hay; autoclaved ventenata-infested hay; and pelleted ventenata-infested hay (PELT). Preference between mixed-grass hay and ventenata-infested hay was calculated such that 0% preference implies a total preference against the treatment diet, 50% preference implies an equal preference between mixed grass hay and ventenata-infested hay, and 100% preference implies a total preference for the treatment diet. Body weight gain was measured at the start and end of the experiment. Daily, intake of the reference diet and treatment diet were measured and percent preference was calculated. Among the 5 treatments, there was no difference in BW gain during the 7 d on treatment. The CTRL treatment showed no difference from 50% preference, indicating that our feed preference test worked. Calves on the VENT treatment had a preference of 19%, highlighting the poor palatability of ventenata-infested hay. Although autoclaving ventenata-infested hay made no difference to palatability, the PELT treatment increased preference to 50%, completely erasing the negative palatability of the ventenata-infested hay. Together, these results show the poor palatability of ventenata-infested hay may be due to texture of the hay and that ventenata's palatability can be improved through feed processing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ventenata (Ventenata dubia) is an invasive grass species that infested rangelands in the inland Northwest, causing significant economic damage through declines in forage production. Despite its nutritional similarity to other forages such as cheatgrass in terms of CP content and NDF digestibility, its palatability for livestock is poor. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of texture and surface-bound microbes in determining palatability of ventenata-infested hay. Thirty-five weaned Charolais calves were separated into 5 treatments according to a taste-preference study that lasted for 7 d. Each animal had access to 2 feed bunks: one with a reference diet (mixed grass hay) and one with a treatment diet. The 5 treatments were the control, which was mixed grass hay used as the reference diet (CTRL); ventenata-infested hay (VENT); autoclaved mixed grass hay; autoclaved ventenata-infested hay; and pelleted ventenata-infested hay (PELT). Preference between mixed-grass hay and ventenata-infested hay was calculated such that 0% preference implies a total preference against the treatment diet, 50% preference implies an equal preference between mixed grass hay and ventenata-infested hay, and 100% preference implies a total preference for the treatment diet. Body weight gain was measured at the start and end of the experiment. Daily, intake of the reference diet and treatment diet were measured and percent preference was calculated. Among the 5 treatments, there was no difference in BW gain during the 7 d on treatment. The CTRL treatment showed no difference from 50% preference, indicating that our feed preference test worked. Calves on the VENT treatment had a preference of 19%, highlighting the poor palatability of ventenata-infested hay. Although autoclaving ventenata-infested hay made no difference to palatability, the PELT treatment increased preference to 50%, completely erasing the negative palatability of the ventenata-infested hay. Together, these results show the poor palatability of ventenata-infested hay may be due to texture of the hay and that ventenata's palatability can be improved through feed processing.

Key concepts: Palatability, Hay, Forage, Biology, Animal science, Livestock, Agronomy, Preference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
295 Feed processing affects palatability of ventenata-infested grass hay — Research Paper | ScholarLens