2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Community Notification Laws

Michael B. Speck

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Community notification was a political response to repeat sex offending fueled by activists and the media's demand for rigid control of sex offenders; however, notification has failed to provide community protection from sex offenders. Data suggest the laws adversely affect the offender's ability to reintegrate into society and have unintended consequences for many others, including the offender's family, other innocent individuals, and the community. Furthermore, a false sense of security and reductions in incest reporting continue to victimize children, which results in further sex offender laws passed by legislatures without empirical data supporting such laws. Community support for notification laws and other restrictions continues to be strong, regardless of the consequences to the offender or other innocent individuals, even though there are a high percentage of community members willing to leave their children unattended regardless of sex offender presence. Research data suggest that sex offenders are a heterogeneous group of individuals, that reoffense rates are relatively low for some offenders, and that a holistic approach to sex offender treatment does reduce reoffense rates even further. Therefore, recommendations listed include eliminating community notification and implementing confidential notification, properly sentencing and treating sex offenders, increasing probation and parole officer quotas, and creating laws focused on proper child supervision.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Community notification was a political response to repeat sex offending fueled by activists and the media's demand for rigid control of sex offenders; however, notification has failed to provide community protection from sex offenders. Data suggest the laws adversely affect the offender's ability to reintegrate into society and have unintended consequences for many others, including the offender's family, other innocent individuals, and the community. Furthermore, a false sense of security and reductions in incest reporting continue to victimize children, which results in further sex offender laws passed by legislatures without empirical data supporting such laws. Community support for notification laws and other restrictions continues to be strong, regardless of the consequences to the offender or other innocent individuals, even though there are a high percentage of community members willing to leave their children unattended regardless of sex offender presence. Research data suggest that sex offenders are a heterogeneous group of individuals, that reoffense rates are relatively low for some offenders, and that a holistic approach to sex offender treatment does reduce reoffense rates even further. Therefore, recommendations listed include eliminating community notification and implementing confidential notification, properly sentencing and treating sex offenders, increasing probation and parole officer quotas, and creating laws focused on proper child supervision.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Community notification was a political response to repeat sex offending fueled by activists and the media's demand for rigid control of sex offenders; however, notification has failed to provide community protection from sex offenders. Data suggest the laws adversely affect the offender's ability to reintegrate into society and have unintended consequences for many others, including the offender's family, other innocent individuals, and the community. Furthermore, a false sense of security and reductions in incest reporting continue to victimize children, which results in further sex offender laws passed by legislatures without empirical data supporting such laws. Community support for notification laws and other restrictions continues to be strong, regardless of the consequences to the offender or other innocent individuals, even though there are a high percentage of community members willing to leave their children unattended regardless of sex offender presence. Research data suggest that sex offenders are a heterogeneous group of individuals, that reoffense rates are relatively low for some offenders, and that a holistic approach to sex offender treatment does reduce reoffense rates even further. Therefore, recommendations listed include eliminating community notification and implementing confidential notification, properly sentencing and treating sex offenders, increasing probation and parole officer quotas, and creating laws focused on proper child supervision.

Key concepts: Law, Business, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Community Notification Laws — Research Paper | ScholarLens