2017EMBO ReportsOpen access

The problem with pseudoscience

Michael D. Gordin

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

Pseudoscience has been the bane of science since the latter became a professional activity. Rather than dismissing it as wrong, the more efficient way of dealing with pseudoscience's false claims is to stress the nature of science itself with all its problems and pitfalls. [Image: see text]

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Pseudoscience has been the bane of science since the latter became a professional activity. Rather than dismissing it as wrong, the more efficient way of dealing with pseudoscience's false claims is to stress the nature of science itself with all its problems and pitfalls. [Image: see text]

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Pseudoscience has been the bane of science since the latter became a professional activity. Rather than dismissing it as wrong, the more efficient way of dealing with pseudoscience's false claims is to stress the nature of science itself with all its problems and pitfalls. [Image: see text]

Key concepts: Pseudoscience, Surprise, Shadow (psychology), Obligation, Antithesis, Point (geometry), Library science, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The problem with pseudoscience — Research Paper | ScholarLens