2017Unpublished venueOpen access

O17.6 A multicenter pilot study evaluating ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin as treatment agents for early syphilis in jiangsu, china

Xiaohong Su, Yuping Cao, Qianqiu Wang, Huazhong Xue, Xiaofeng Zhu

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin in non-pregnant, immunocompetent adults with early syphilis since there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting ceftriaxone as an alternative treatment for early syphilis without an HIV co-infection. Methods A randomised, open-label controlled study evaluating the efficacy of ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin was performed in four hospitals in Jiangsu Province. Treatment comprised either ceftriaxone (1.0 g, intravenously, once daily for 10 days) or benzathine penicillin (2.4 million units, intramuscularly, once per week for two weeks). Serological response was defined as at least a 4-fold decline in rapid plasma regain(RPR) titer. Results In all, 301 patients with early syphilis were enrolled in this study; 230 subjects completed the follow-ups. The median follow-up period was 9 months. Among these 230 patients, a serological response was observed in 83.9% and 86.5% at the 6- and 12 month follow-ups, respectively. There were significant differences between the ceftriaxone- and penicillin-treated groups at both the 6- (90.2% vs 80.0%; p=0.012) and 12 month follow-ups (92.0% vs 81.4%; p=0.021), especially in patients with secondary syphilis (p<0.05). Moreover, the Jarisch–Herzheimer reaction was positively associated with treatment regimen prognosis (p<0.05). Conclusion Our serological data demonstrate that this ceftriaxone regimen is more effective than the currently recommended benzathine penicillin regimen for early syphilis in non-pregnant, immunocompetent patients, especially for secondary syphilis.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin in non-pregnant, immunocompetent adults with early syphilis since there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting ceftriaxone as an alternative treatment for early syphilis without an HIV co-infection. Methods A randomised, open-label controlled study evaluating the efficacy of ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin was performed in four hospitals in Jiangsu Province. Treatment comprised either ceftriaxone (1.0 g, intravenously, once daily for 10 days) or benzathine penicillin (2.4 million units, intramuscularly, once per week for two weeks). Serological response was defined as at least a 4-fold decline in rapid plasma regain(RPR) titer. Results In all, 301 patients with early syphilis were enrolled in this study; 230 subjects completed the follow-ups. The median follow-up period was 9 months. Among these 230 patients, a serological response was observed in 83.9% and 86.5% at the 6- and 12 month follow-ups, respectively. There were significant differences between the ceftriaxone- and penicillin-treated groups at both the 6- (90.2% vs 80.0%; p=0.012) and 12 month follow-ups (92.0% vs 81.4%; p=0.021), especially in patients with secondary syphilis (p<0.05). Moreover, the Jarisch–Herzheimer reaction was positively associated with treatment regimen prognosis (p<0.05). Conclusion Our serological data demonstrate that this ceftriaxone regimen is more effective than the currently recommended benzathine penicillin regimen for early syphilis in non-pregnant, immunocompetent patients, especially for secondary syphilis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin in non-pregnant, immunocompetent adults with early syphilis since there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting ceftriaxone as an alternative treatment for early syphilis without an HIV co-infection. Methods A randomised, open-label controlled study evaluating the efficacy of ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin was performed in four hospitals in Jiangsu Province. Treatment comprised either ceftriaxone (1.0 g, intravenously, once daily for 10 days) or benzathine penicillin (2.4 million units, intramuscularly, once per week for two weeks). Serological response was defined as at least a 4-fold decline in rapid plasma regain(RPR) titer. Results In all, 301 patients with early syphilis were enrolled in this study; 230 subjects completed the follow-ups. The median follow-up period was 9 months. Among these 230 patients, a serological response was observed in 83.9% and 86.5% at the 6- and 12 month follow-ups, respectively. There were significant differences between the ceftriaxone- and penicillin-treated groups at both the 6- (90.2% vs 80.0%; p=0.012) and 12 month follow-ups (92.0% vs 81.4%; p=0.021), especially in patients with secondary syphilis (p<0.05). Moreover, the Jarisch–Herzheimer reaction was positively associated with treatment regimen prognosis (p<0.05). Conclusion Our serological data demonstrate that this ceftriaxone regimen is more effective than the currently recommended benzathine penicillin regimen for early syphilis in non-pregnant, immunocompetent patients, especially for secondary syphilis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ceftriaxone, Regimen, Syphilis, Penicillin, Serology, Internal medicine, Early syphilis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
O17.6 A multicenter pilot study evaluating ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin as treatment agents for early syphilis in jiangsu, china — Research Paper | ScholarLens