2007•Unpublished venueRequires access

Education in Pharmacy: Purposes, Knowledge and Identities

Milena Jadrijević-Mladar Takač

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Changes in education of pharmacists and regulation of pharmacy practice are parallel developments. Traditionally, education has been a strong driver of changes in practice, but sometimes it may lag behind the needs of practice. The need for pharmacy education reconstruction and redirecting of attention towards pharmaceutical care in focus, with the aim of pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical sciences developments, has never been greater. This is common characteristic for pharmacy in each country regardless on its historical background, geographic position, political system and economy, but all these have impact on each national pharmacy education development. On the other hand, globalization with no borders for information (Internet, e-pharmacy) and with quite uniform pharmaceutical market regarding the wide spectrum of medicines, requires almost the same level of knowledge and pharmacy competences. Effective pharmacy practice, based on research evidence and best practice, requires an understanding of the social context within which pharmacy is practised, recognising the particular needs and circumstances of the users of pharmaceutical services, and of pharmacy's place within health service provision. All these have to be implemented from the early stage of pharmacy education, because undergraduates today are future pharmacy practitioners. Recently pharmacy education in European region has passed their curricula reform within Bologna process, and many new courses relevant to modern pharmacy and pharmaceutical care have been introduced into new syllabus. With all these changes at local European level and strong support from the global level (FIP-WHO Pharmacy Education Action Plan) many questions regarding the entry-to practice degree program, as well as continuing pharmacy education (CE) and continuing professional development (CPD) are still opened: Do we really prepare our undergraduates for their mission in forthcoming years? Do we prepare them for demanding role of pharmaceutical researcher today and in the future? Are they ready to fit the practice purpose? Can we predict the near and longer-term trends in pharmacy education? Have we any (or the only) impact on pharmacy professional behaviour latter? How to establish needed parameters for quality assurance in pharmacy education and pharmacy practice in CPD?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Changes in education of pharmacists and regulation of pharmacy practice are parallel developments. Traditionally, education has been a strong driver of changes in practice, but sometimes it may lag behind the needs of practice. The need for pharmacy education reconstruction and redirecting of attention towards pharmaceutical care in focus, with the aim of pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical sciences developments, has never been greater. This is common characteristic for pharmacy in each country regardless on its historical background, geographic position, political system and economy, but all these have impact on each national pharmacy education development. On the other hand, globalization with no borders for information (Internet, e-pharmacy) and with quite uniform pharmaceutical market regarding the wide spectrum of medicines, requires almost the same level of knowledge and pharmacy competences. Effective pharmacy practice, based on research evidence and best practice, requires an understanding of the social context within which pharmacy is practised, recognising the particular needs and circumstances of the users of pharmaceutical services, and of pharmacy's place within health service provision. All these have to be implemented from the early stage of pharmacy education, because undergraduates today are future pharmacy practitioners. Recently pharmacy education in European region has passed their curricula reform within Bologna process, and many new courses relevant to modern pharmacy and pharmaceutical care have been introduced into new syllabus. With all these changes at local European level and strong support from the global level (FIP-WHO Pharmacy Education Action Plan) many questions regarding the entry-to practice degree program, as well as continuing pharmacy education (CE) and continuing professional development (CPD) are still opened: Do we really prepare our undergraduates for their mission in forthcoming years? Do we prepare them for demanding role of pharmaceutical researcher today and in the future? Are they ready to fit the practice purpose? Can we predict the near and longer-term trends in pharmacy education? Have we any (or the only) impact on pharmacy professional behaviour latter? How to establish needed parameters for quality assurance in pharmacy education and pharmacy practice in CPD?

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Changes in education of pharmacists and regulation of pharmacy practice are parallel developments. Traditionally, education has been a strong driver of changes in practice, but sometimes it may lag behind the needs of practice. The need for pharmacy education reconstruction and redirecting of attention towards pharmaceutical care in focus, with the aim of pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical sciences developments, has never been greater. This is common characteristic for pharmacy in each country regardless on its historical background, geographic position, political system and economy, but all these have impact on each national pharmacy education development. On the other hand, globalization with no borders for information (Internet, e-pharmacy) and with quite uniform pharmaceutical market regarding the wide spectrum of medicines, requires almost the same level of knowledge and pharmacy competences. Effective pharmacy practice, based on research evidence and best practice, requires an understanding of the social context within which pharmacy is practised, recognising the particular needs and circumstances of the users of pharmaceutical services, and of pharmacy's place within health service provision. All these have to be implemented from the early stage of pharmacy education, because undergraduates today are future pharmacy practitioners. Recently pharmacy education in European region has passed their curricula reform within Bologna process, and many new courses relevant to modern pharmacy and pharmaceutical care have been introduced into new syllabus. With all these changes at local European level and strong support from the global level (FIP-WHO Pharmacy Education Action Plan) many questions regarding the entry-to practice degree program, as well as continuing pharmacy education (CE) and continuing professional development (CPD) are still opened: Do we really prepare our undergraduates for their mission in forthcoming years? Do we prepare them for demanding role of pharmaceutical researcher today and in the future? Are they ready to fit the practice purpose? Can we predict the near and longer-term trends in pharmacy education? Have we any (or the only) impact on pharmacy professional behaviour latter? How to establish needed parameters for quality assurance in pharmacy education and pharmacy practice in CPD?

Key concepts: Pharmacy, Pharmacy practice, Pharmaconomist, Clinical pharmacy, Medicine, Pharmaceutical care, Health care, Context (archaeology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Education in Pharmacy: Purposes, Knowledge and Identities — Research Paper | ScholarLens