1998The Chinese Journal of Clinical PharmacologyRequires access

A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL ON PIPERACILLIN/TAZOBACTAM VERSUS TICARCILLIN/CLAVULANIC ACID FOR THE TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL INFECTIONS

Jia Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A randomized, open-label, controlled study was conducted for the treatment on 124 hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infection and urinary tract infections to compare the efficacy and safety of two β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanic aicd .63 patients received piperacillin-tazobactam(4g·(500mg)-1) every 8 hours by intravenous infusion and 61 patients received ticarcillin/clavulanic acid(3g·(200mg)-1) every 8 hours by intravenous infusion. The duration was 7-14 days in two groups. 63 of 79 cases received piperacillin/tazobactam and 61 of 84 cases received ticarcillin/clavulanic acid were assessable for clinical efficacy. The overall effcacy rates were 90.5% for the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 88.5% for the ticarcillin /clavulanic acid group, whereas the bacterial eradication rates were 90.2% and 92.0%, respectively. 78 (77.2%) of 101 strains isolated from patients produced β-lactamase.The adverse drug reaction was evaluated in 65 cases of piperacillin/tazobactam group and 62 cases of ticarcillin/clavulanic acid group, the adverse drug reaction rates were 7.69%(5/65) and 8.06%(5/62), respectively. The results showed that there were no statistical differences between these two groups.(P0.05) .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A randomized, open-label, controlled study was conducted for the treatment on 124 hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infection and urinary tract infections to compare the efficacy and safety of two β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanic aicd .63 patients received piperacillin-tazobactam(4g·(500mg)-1) every 8 hours by intravenous infusion and 61 patients received ticarcillin/clavulanic acid(3g·(200mg)-1) every 8 hours by intravenous infusion. The duration was 7-14 days in two groups. 63 of 79 cases received piperacillin/tazobactam and 61 of 84 cases received ticarcillin/clavulanic acid were assessable for clinical efficacy. The overall effcacy rates were 90.5% for the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 88.5% for the ticarcillin /clavulanic acid group, whereas the bacterial eradication rates were 90.2% and 92.0%, respectively. 78 (77.2%) of 101 strains isolated from patients produced β-lactamase.The adverse drug reaction was evaluated in 65 cases of piperacillin/tazobactam group and 62 cases of ticarcillin/clavulanic acid group, the adverse drug reaction rates were 7.69%(5/65) and 8.06%(5/62), respectively. The results showed that there were no statistical differences between these two groups.(P0.05) .

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A randomized, open-label, controlled study was conducted for the treatment on 124 hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infection and urinary tract infections to compare the efficacy and safety of two β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanic aicd .63 patients received piperacillin-tazobactam(4g·(500mg)-1) every 8 hours by intravenous infusion and 61 patients received ticarcillin/clavulanic acid(3g·(200mg)-1) every 8 hours by intravenous infusion. The duration was 7-14 days in two groups. 63 of 79 cases received piperacillin/tazobactam and 61 of 84 cases received ticarcillin/clavulanic acid were assessable for clinical efficacy. The overall effcacy rates were 90.5% for the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 88.5% for the ticarcillin /clavulanic acid group, whereas the bacterial eradication rates were 90.2% and 92.0%, respectively. 78 (77.2%) of 101 strains isolated from patients produced β-lactamase.The adverse drug reaction was evaluated in 65 cases of piperacillin/tazobactam group and 62 cases of ticarcillin/clavulanic acid group, the adverse drug reaction rates were 7.69%(5/65) and 8.06%(5/62), respectively. The results showed that there were no statistical differences between these two groups.(P0.05) .

Key concepts: Ticarcillin, Piperacillin/tazobactam, Piperacillin, Clavulanic acid, Tazobactam, Medicine, Internal medicine, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL ON PIPERACILLIN/TAZOBACTAM VERSUS TICARCILLIN/CLAVULANIC ACID FOR THE TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL INFECTIONS — Research Paper | ScholarLens