Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis with evidence from 1998 to 2016
Juanjuan Zhang, Yanyan Yu, Ying Li, Lunshou Wei
Abstract
Open-access reader
Juanjuan Zhang, Yanyan Yu, Ying Li, Lunshou Wei
Abstract
Open-access reader
// Juanjuan Zhang 1, * , Yanyan Yu 1, * , Ying Li 1 and Lunshou Wei 2 1 Department of Ultrasound, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, China 2 Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, China * Co-first authors Correspondence to: Lunshou Wei, email: weilunshou@163.com Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, diagnostic value, meta-analysis Received: June 28, 2017 Accepted: July 26, 2017 Published: August 07, 2017 ABSTRACT Background: This meta-analysis is aimed at determining the diagnostic value of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify published studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated. Data from eligible studies were used to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR) and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Meta-Disc and STATA softwares were utilized for all statistical analyses. Results: Fifty-three eligible studies (publication years ranged from 1998 to 2016) were selected according to inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS to detect HCC were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84–0.86) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90–0.92), respectively. The pooled positive and negative LRs were 6.28 (95% CI: 4.49–8.77) and 0.16 (95% CI: 0.12–0.22), respectively. The pooled DOR was 55.01 (95% CI: 35.25–83.47). The area under the SCOR curve was 0.9432. Meta-regression and funnel plot indicated that sample size, type of contrast agents and publication bias might be the major sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions: CEUS is a valuable diagnostic tool for identifying HCC in clinic with highly sensitive and specific.
OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
// Juanjuan Zhang 1, * , Yanyan Yu 1, * , Ying Li 1 and Lunshou Wei 2 1 Department of Ultrasound, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, China 2 Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, China * Co-first authors Correspondence to: Lunshou Wei, email: weilunshou@163.com Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, diagnostic value, meta-analysis Received: June 28, 2017 Accepted: July 26, 2017 Published: August 07, 2017 ABSTRACT Background: This meta-analysis is aimed at determining the diagnostic value of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify published studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated. Data from eligible studies were used to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR) and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Meta-Disc and STATA softwares were utilized for all statistical analyses. Results: Fifty-three eligible studies (publication years ranged from 1998 to 2016) were selected according to inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS to detect HCC were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84–0.86) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90–0.92), respectively. The pooled positive and negative LRs were 6.28 (95% CI: 4.49–8.77) and 0.16 (95% CI: 0.12–0.22), respectively. The pooled DOR was 55.01 (95% CI: 35.25–83.47). The area under the SCOR curve was 0.9432. Meta-regression and funnel plot indicated that sample size, type of contrast agents and publication bias might be the major sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions: CEUS is a valuable diagnostic tool for identifying HCC in clinic with highly sensitive and specific.
Key concepts: Meta-analysis, Diagnostic odds ratio, Medicine, Cochrane Library, Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Receiver operating characteristic, Odds ratio