2016StrokeRequires access

Abstract TP55: Rate of Infarct Growth in Acute Ischemic Stroke is Independent of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Threshold

Rani Gupta Sah, Saad Khan, Ajay Mahajan, Nils D. Forkert, Moiz Hafeez, Adrian Tsang, Christopher D. d’Esterre, Phillip A Barber

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: For acute stroke assessment, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides sensitive detection of infarct volume. Identification of infarct growth in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is important for determining the efficacy of stroke therapy. Reported ADC thresholds for detecting AIS vary from 550 to 650 x10^-6mm^2/s. Therefore, the measurement of infarct growth is not standardized. Hypothesis: Measurement of the rate of infarct growth after stroke is independent of the ADC threshold used. Methods: 38 AIS patients (age; 71.5±17.0) were imaged acutely (within 4h) after stroke symptoms (Time1-Baseline) and repeated at 24h (Time2) on a 3T MR scanner. DTI data with 15 directions was acquired and used for ADC map calculations. Lesion volumes were calculated with ADC thresholds of 550, 600, 630 and 650 x10^-6mm^2/s using ANTONIA software. Rate (r) of infarct growth was calculated by r=Δvolume(ADC2-ADC1)/Δtime(time2-time1). Results: ADC volume and rate of infarct growth is reported in table 1. No significant difference was found in the rate of infarct growth between the two time points (one way ANOVA). Conclusion: Quantification of infarct evolution is critical for determining the efficacy of stroke therapy. Although absolute lesion volumes vary considerably, the rate of infarct growth is independent of the ADC threshold and should be the preferred measure of acute infarct growth.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: For acute stroke assessment, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides sensitive detection of infarct volume. Identification of infarct growth in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is important for determining the efficacy of stroke therapy. Reported ADC thresholds for detecting AIS vary from 550 to 650 x10^-6mm^2/s. Therefore, the measurement of infarct growth is not standardized. Hypothesis: Measurement of the rate of infarct growth after stroke is independent of the ADC threshold used. Methods: 38 AIS patients (age; 71.5±17.0) were imaged acutely (within 4h) after stroke symptoms (Time1-Baseline) and repeated at 24h (Time2) on a 3T MR scanner. DTI data with 15 directions was acquired and used for ADC map calculations. Lesion volumes were calculated with ADC thresholds of 550, 600, 630 and 650 x10^-6mm^2/s using ANTONIA software. Rate (r) of infarct growth was calculated by r=Δvolume(ADC2-ADC1)/Δtime(time2-time1). Results: ADC volume and rate of infarct growth is reported in table 1. No significant difference was found in the rate of infarct growth between the two time points (one way ANOVA). Conclusion: Quantification of infarct evolution is critical for determining the efficacy of stroke therapy. Although absolute lesion volumes vary considerably, the rate of infarct growth is independent of the ADC threshold and should be the preferred measure of acute infarct growth.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: For acute stroke assessment, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides sensitive detection of infarct volume. Identification of infarct growth in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is important for determining the efficacy of stroke therapy. Reported ADC thresholds for detecting AIS vary from 550 to 650 x10^-6mm^2/s. Therefore, the measurement of infarct growth is not standardized. Hypothesis: Measurement of the rate of infarct growth after stroke is independent of the ADC threshold used. Methods: 38 AIS patients (age; 71.5±17.0) were imaged acutely (within 4h) after stroke symptoms (Time1-Baseline) and repeated at 24h (Time2) on a 3T MR scanner. DTI data with 15 directions was acquired and used for ADC map calculations. Lesion volumes were calculated with ADC thresholds of 550, 600, 630 and 650 x10^-6mm^2/s using ANTONIA software. Rate (r) of infarct growth was calculated by r=Δvolume(ADC2-ADC1)/Δtime(time2-time1). Results: ADC volume and rate of infarct growth is reported in table 1. No significant difference was found in the rate of infarct growth between the two time points (one way ANOVA). Conclusion: Quantification of infarct evolution is critical for determining the efficacy of stroke therapy. Although absolute lesion volumes vary considerably, the rate of infarct growth is independent of the ADC threshold and should be the preferred measure of acute infarct growth.

Key concepts: Medicine, Effective diffusion coefficient, Stroke (engine), Infarction, Nuclear medicine, Diffusion MRI, Cardiology, Lesion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Abstract TP55: Rate of Infarct Growth in Acute Ischemic Stroke is Independent of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Threshold — Research Paper | ScholarLens