2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Cultural Identity and Personal Identity Philosophical Reflections on the Identity Discourse of Social Psychology

Thomas E. Wren

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses the relationship between personal identity and what is variously called group identity, reference group orientation, and - in the broadest sense of the term- cultural identity, with a special interest paid to how the contrast between these two sorts of identity operates in the discourse of modem social science. The orthodox discourse of social scientists, especially that of personality theorists, treats personal identity as an epiphenomenon of group identity and as an amalgam of self-concept and self-esteem. This conceptual construction has grown out of a more general discussion in the mid-20th century social theory concerning how individuals are related to groups, and is represented by Kurt Lewin in the 1940s and, more recently, by contemporary racial identity theorists. In opposition to Lewin, the latter argue that a positive personal identity (strong self-esteem, etc.) can and often does coexist with a negative group identity (reference group disaffiliation, etc.). However, they share with Lewin and most social scientists the uncritical assumption that identity - individual or group - is static and integral, rather than the discursive outcome of a fluid, collaborative dialogue among real people with overlapping perspectives and preferences. Beneath their claims that personal and group identity are social constructions lies an unrecon­ structed essentialism that reifies these concepts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses the relationship between personal identity and what is variously called group identity, reference group orientation, and - in the broadest sense of the term- cultural identity, with a special interest paid to how the contrast between these two sorts of identity operates in the discourse of modem social science. The orthodox discourse of social scientists, especially that of personality theorists, treats personal identity as an epiphenomenon of group identity and as an amalgam of self-concept and self-esteem. This conceptual construction has grown out of a more general discussion in the mid-20th century social theory concerning how individuals are related to groups, and is represented by Kurt Lewin in the 1940s and, more recently, by contemporary racial identity theorists. In opposition to Lewin, the latter argue that a positive personal identity (strong self-esteem, etc.) can and often does coexist with a negative group identity (reference group disaffiliation, etc.). However, they share with Lewin and most social scientists the uncritical assumption that identity - individual or group - is static and integral, rather than the discursive outcome of a fluid, collaborative dialogue among real people with overlapping perspectives and preferences. Beneath their claims that personal and group identity are social constructions lies an unrecon­ structed essentialism that reifies these concepts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses the relationship between personal identity and what is variously called group identity, reference group orientation, and - in the broadest sense of the term- cultural identity, with a special interest paid to how the contrast between these two sorts of identity operates in the discourse of modem social science. The orthodox discourse of social scientists, especially that of personality theorists, treats personal identity as an epiphenomenon of group identity and as an amalgam of self-concept and self-esteem. This conceptual construction has grown out of a more general discussion in the mid-20th century social theory concerning how individuals are related to groups, and is represented by Kurt Lewin in the 1940s and, more recently, by contemporary racial identity theorists. In opposition to Lewin, the latter argue that a positive personal identity (strong self-esteem, etc.) can and often does coexist with a negative group identity (reference group disaffiliation, etc.). However, they share with Lewin and most social scientists the uncritical assumption that identity - individual or group - is static and integral, rather than the discursive outcome of a fluid, collaborative dialogue among real people with overlapping perspectives and preferences. Beneath their claims that personal and group identity are social constructions lies an unrecon­ structed essentialism that reifies these concepts.

Key concepts: Social identity approach, Identity formation, Personal identity, Identity (music), Social identity theory, Social group, Cultural identity, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cultural Identity and Personal Identity Philosophical Reflections on the Identity Discourse of Social Psychology — Research Paper | ScholarLens