Cultural Identity and Personal Identity Philosophical Reflections on the Identity Discourse of Social Psychology
Thomas E. Wren
Abstract
Thomas E. Wren
Abstract
This chapter discusses the relationship between personal identity and what is variously called group identity, reference group orientation, and - in the broadest sense of the term- cultural identity, with a special interest paid to how the contrast between these two sorts of identity operates in the discourse of modem social science. The orthodox discourse of social scientists, especially that of personality theorists, treats personal identity as an epiphenomenon of group identity and as an amalgam of self-concept and self-esteem. This conceptual construction has grown out of a more general discussion in the mid-20th century social theory concerning how individuals are related to groups, and is represented by Kurt Lewin in the 1940s and, more recently, by contemporary racial identity theorists. In opposition to Lewin, the latter argue that a positive personal identity (strong self-esteem, etc.) can and often does coexist with a negative group identity (reference group disaffiliation, etc.). However, they share with Lewin and most social scientists the uncritical assumption that identity - individual or group - is static and integral, rather than the discursive outcome of a fluid, collaborative dialogue among real people with overlapping perspectives and preferences. Beneath their claims that personal and group identity are social constructions lies an unrecon structed essentialism that reifies these concepts.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter discusses the relationship between personal identity and what is variously called group identity, reference group orientation, and - in the broadest sense of the term- cultural identity, with a special interest paid to how the contrast between these two sorts of identity operates in the discourse of modem social science. The orthodox discourse of social scientists, especially that of personality theorists, treats personal identity as an epiphenomenon of group identity and as an amalgam of self-concept and self-esteem. This conceptual construction has grown out of a more general discussion in the mid-20th century social theory concerning how individuals are related to groups, and is represented by Kurt Lewin in the 1940s and, more recently, by contemporary racial identity theorists. In opposition to Lewin, the latter argue that a positive personal identity (strong self-esteem, etc.) can and often does coexist with a negative group identity (reference group disaffiliation, etc.). However, they share with Lewin and most social scientists the uncritical assumption that identity - individual or group - is static and integral, rather than the discursive outcome of a fluid, collaborative dialogue among real people with overlapping perspectives and preferences. Beneath their claims that personal and group identity are social constructions lies an unrecon structed essentialism that reifies these concepts.
Key concepts: Social identity approach, Identity formation, Personal identity, Identity (music), Social identity theory, Social group, Cultural identity, Social psychology