2017Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)Requires access

The importance of visual and vocal cues of organizational spokespersons in times of crisis

Aurélie De Waele, An‐Sofie Claeys, Veroline Cauberghe, Gijs Fannes

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in nonverbal aspects of crisis communication. Some studies have examined the impact of visual cues (e.g., facial expressions), while one study has examined the impact of vocal cues (voice pitch). Findings from social psychology indicate that visual cues may be more dominant than vocal cues in affecting the perception of a speaker. Two studies therefore explored the relative importance of visual and vocal cues of spokespersons in crisis communication. Each study examined the effects of deceptive visual cues, while one study focused on their interaction with speech disturbances and another on their interaction with voice pitch. The results show that the impact of visual cues dominates the effects of vocal cues. In study one, visual cues affected consumers’ attitudes towards the organization and study two illustrates that visual cues also affect purchase intentions. In both studies, the impact of vocal cues depended on visual cues.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is an increasing interest in nonverbal aspects of crisis communication. Some studies have examined the impact of visual cues (e.g., facial expressions), while one study has examined the impact of vocal cues (voice pitch). Findings from social psychology indicate that visual cues may be more dominant than vocal cues in affecting the perception of a speaker. Two studies therefore explored the relative importance of visual and vocal cues of spokespersons in crisis communication. Each study examined the effects of deceptive visual cues, while one study focused on their interaction with speech disturbances and another on their interaction with voice pitch. The results show that the impact of visual cues dominates the effects of vocal cues. In study one, visual cues affected consumers’ attitudes towards the organization and study two illustrates that visual cues also affect purchase intentions. In both studies, the impact of vocal cues depended on visual cues.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is an increasing interest in nonverbal aspects of crisis communication. Some studies have examined the impact of visual cues (e.g., facial expressions), while one study has examined the impact of vocal cues (voice pitch). Findings from social psychology indicate that visual cues may be more dominant than vocal cues in affecting the perception of a speaker. Two studies therefore explored the relative importance of visual and vocal cues of spokespersons in crisis communication. Each study examined the effects of deceptive visual cues, while one study focused on their interaction with speech disturbances and another on their interaction with voice pitch. The results show that the impact of visual cues dominates the effects of vocal cues. In study one, visual cues affected consumers’ attitudes towards the organization and study two illustrates that visual cues also affect purchase intentions. In both studies, the impact of vocal cues depended on visual cues.

Key concepts: Sensory cue, Psychology, Cue-dependent forgetting, Social cue, Perception, Nonverbal communication, Cognitive psychology, Affect (linguistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The importance of visual and vocal cues of organizational spokespersons in times of crisis — Research Paper | ScholarLens