ScholarLens Back to search
1998•ACP Journal ClubRequires access

Atrial pacing was better than ventricular pacing for the sick-sinus syndrome

Gregory Y.H. Lip

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Source Citation Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997 Oct 25;350:1210-6.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Source Citation Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997 Oct 25;350:1210-6.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Source Citation Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997 Oct 25;350:1210-6.

Key concepts: Medicine, Sick sinus syndrome, Cardiac pacing, Ventricular pacing, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Heart failure

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Atrial pacing was better than ventricular pacing for the sick-sinus syndrome — Research Paper | ScholarLens