2017Diagnostic CytopathologyRequires access

Quality assessment and improvement of “Unsatisfactory” liquid‐based cervicovaginal papanicolaou smears

Neda Mirzamani, Karen Chau, Oana C. Rafael, Uday Shergill, Sujata Sajjan, Irina Sumskaya, Cecilia Gimenez, Melissa Klein, Kasturi Das

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The quality of cervicovaginal smears determines the success of cytology in screening programs for cervical cancer. Bethesda 2014 revisited the adequacy criteria for atrophic smears and redefined the squamous cell count in the "unsatisfactory" category. In this study, we evaluated the smear quality of Thinprep liquid-based cervicovaginal Papanicolaou cytology slides (TPS) that were previously deemed unsatisfactory, to determine reasons for such categorization. In addition, we attempted to establish the impact of the new adequacy criteria on the rate and management of unsatisfactory diagnosis. METHODS: About 234 unsatisfactory TPS were examined. The reasons for unsatisfactory were noted. The number of squamous cells was recounted, as per the new Bethesda criteria, in borderline adequacy cases that showed an atrophic pattern. RESULTS: The leading cause for unsatisfactory TPS was lubricating gel, followed by blood, as observed in older and younger age groups, respectively (Figure 1). Eleven borderline cases were reclassified as "satisfactory" using the new Bethesda cell count, with 27% above 60 years of age. About 82% of these borderline cases were negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy on repeat testing. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference of management or change in rate of unsatisfactory when patients above 60 were reclassified into the satisfactory category using the new Bethesda count. However, a larger study is needed to evaluate whether the new recommendation for minimum cellularity can be implemented in patients above a certain age cut-off. The study highlights the need for improvement in collection practices and education of practitioners.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: The quality of cervicovaginal smears determines the success of cytology in screening programs for cervical cancer. Bethesda 2014 revisited the adequacy criteria for atrophic smears and redefined the squamous cell count in the "unsatisfactory" category. In this study, we evaluated the smear quality of Thinprep liquid-based cervicovaginal Papanicolaou cytology slides (TPS) that were previously deemed unsatisfactory, to determine reasons for such categorization. In addition, we attempted to establish the impact of the new adequacy criteria on the rate and management of unsatisfactory diagnosis. METHODS: About 234 unsatisfactory TPS were examined. The reasons for unsatisfactory were noted. The number of squamous cells was recounted, as per the new Bethesda criteria, in borderline adequacy cases that showed an atrophic pattern. RESULTS: The leading cause for unsatisfactory TPS was lubricating gel, followed by blood, as observed in older and younger age groups, respectively (Figure 1). Eleven borderline cases were reclassified as "satisfactory" using the new Bethesda cell count, with 27% above 60 years of age. About 82% of these borderline cases were negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy on repeat testing. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference of management or change in rate of unsatisfactory when patients above 60 were reclassified into the satisfactory category using the new Bethesda count. However, a larger study is needed to evaluate whether the new recommendation for minimum cellularity can be implemented in patients above a certain age cut-off. The study highlights the need for improvement in collection practices and education of practitioners.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: The quality of cervicovaginal smears determines the success of cytology in screening programs for cervical cancer. Bethesda 2014 revisited the adequacy criteria for atrophic smears and redefined the squamous cell count in the "unsatisfactory" category. In this study, we evaluated the smear quality of Thinprep liquid-based cervicovaginal Papanicolaou cytology slides (TPS) that were previously deemed unsatisfactory, to determine reasons for such categorization. In addition, we attempted to establish the impact of the new adequacy criteria on the rate and management of unsatisfactory diagnosis. METHODS: About 234 unsatisfactory TPS were examined. The reasons for unsatisfactory were noted. The number of squamous cells was recounted, as per the new Bethesda criteria, in borderline adequacy cases that showed an atrophic pattern. RESULTS: The leading cause for unsatisfactory TPS was lubricating gel, followed by blood, as observed in older and younger age groups, respectively (Figure 1). Eleven borderline cases were reclassified as "satisfactory" using the new Bethesda cell count, with 27% above 60 years of age. About 82% of these borderline cases were negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy on repeat testing. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference of management or change in rate of unsatisfactory when patients above 60 were reclassified into the satisfactory category using the new Bethesda count. However, a larger study is needed to evaluate whether the new recommendation for minimum cellularity can be implemented in patients above a certain age cut-off. The study highlights the need for improvement in collection practices and education of practitioners.

Key concepts: Medicine, Bethesda system, Papanicolaou stain, Squamous intraepithelial lesion, Papanicolaou Test, Gynecology, Malignancy, Cytology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quality assessment and improvement of “Unsatisfactory” liquid‐based cervicovaginal papanicolaou smears — Research Paper | ScholarLens