2017Journal of the African Literature AssociationRequires access

Whiteness and future environmentalism in J.M. Coetzee'sDisgrace(1999)

Weeraya Donsomsakulkij

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

By critically examining “whiteness” and the interconnectedness between human and nonhuman agencies in J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace, I highlight a possibility of a future of environmentalism in forms of an ethics of ecological diversity that aims to maintain multispecies interconnectedness and encourage multispecies considerateness. My analysis here examines literary tropes associated with multispecies and employs the future as a crucial dimension, anticipating it as an alternative that makes us aware of our own role in generating our lives. The future marks the potential of literature to widen human visions in making sense of the past while imagining what may become. This future emerges in forms of an environmentalism that connects responsibility and attentiveness to experience of the self and the other. As a result, this future environmentalism reveals literature's ability to raise socio-environmental dilemmas through its engagement with the past.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

By critically examining “whiteness” and the interconnectedness between human and nonhuman agencies in J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace, I highlight a possibility of a future of environmentalism in forms of an ethics of ecological diversity that aims to maintain multispecies interconnectedness and encourage multispecies considerateness. My analysis here examines literary tropes associated with multispecies and employs the future as a crucial dimension, anticipating it as an alternative that makes us aware of our own role in generating our lives. The future marks the potential of literature to widen human visions in making sense of the past while imagining what may become. This future emerges in forms of an environmentalism that connects responsibility and attentiveness to experience of the self and the other. As a result, this future environmentalism reveals literature's ability to raise socio-environmental dilemmas through its engagement with the past.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

By critically examining “whiteness” and the interconnectedness between human and nonhuman agencies in J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace, I highlight a possibility of a future of environmentalism in forms of an ethics of ecological diversity that aims to maintain multispecies interconnectedness and encourage multispecies considerateness. My analysis here examines literary tropes associated with multispecies and employs the future as a crucial dimension, anticipating it as an alternative that makes us aware of our own role in generating our lives. The future marks the potential of literature to widen human visions in making sense of the past while imagining what may become. This future emerges in forms of an environmentalism that connects responsibility and attentiveness to experience of the self and the other. As a result, this future environmentalism reveals literature's ability to raise socio-environmental dilemmas through its engagement with the past.

Key concepts: Environmentalism, Vision, Environmental ethics, Sociology, Diversity (politics), Dimension (graph theory), Aesthetics, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Whiteness and future environmentalism in J.M. Coetzee'sDisgrace(1999) — Research Paper | ScholarLens