Correlation Between Bowel Preparation and the Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy
Jung Hun Park, Sang Jin Kim, Jong Hee Hyun, Kyung Su Han, Byung Chang Kim, Chang Won Hong, Sang-Jeon Lee, Dae Kyung Sohn
Abstract
Open-access reader
Jung Hun Park, Sang Jin Kim, Jong Hee Hyun, Kyung Su Han, Byung Chang Kim, Chang Won Hong, Sang-Jeon Lee, Dae Kyung Sohn
Abstract
Open-access reader
Purpose: The adenoma detection rate is commonly used as a measure of the quality of colonoscopy.This study assessed both the association between the adenoma detection rate and the quality of bowel preparation and the risk factors associated with the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy.Methods: This retrospective analysis involved 1,079 individuals who underwent screening colonoscopy at the National Cancer Center between December 2012 and April 2014.Bowel preparation was classified by using the Aronchick scale.Individuals with inadequate bowel preparations (n = 47, 4.4%) were excluded because additional bowel preparation was needed.The results of 1,032 colonoscopies were included in the analysis.Results: The subjects' mean age was 53.1 years, and 657 subjects (63.7%) were men.The mean cecal intubation time was 6.7 minutes, and the mean withdrawal time was 8.7 minutes.The adenoma and polyp detection rates were 28.1% and 41.8%, respectively.The polyp, adenoma, and advanced adenoma detection rates did not correlate with the quality of bowel preparation.The multivariate analysis showed age ≥ 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.97;P = 0.040), body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m 2 (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.17-2.08;P = 0.002) and current smoking (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01-2.06;P = 0.014) to be independent risk factors for adenoma detection.Conclusion: The adenoma detection rate was unrelated to the quality of bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy.Older age, obesity, and smoking were independent risk factors for adenoma detection.
OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Purpose: The adenoma detection rate is commonly used as a measure of the quality of colonoscopy.This study assessed both the association between the adenoma detection rate and the quality of bowel preparation and the risk factors associated with the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy.Methods: This retrospective analysis involved 1,079 individuals who underwent screening colonoscopy at the National Cancer Center between December 2012 and April 2014.Bowel preparation was classified by using the Aronchick scale.Individuals with inadequate bowel preparations (n = 47, 4.4%) were excluded because additional bowel preparation was needed.The results of 1,032 colonoscopies were included in the analysis.Results: The subjects' mean age was 53.1 years, and 657 subjects (63.7%) were men.The mean cecal intubation time was 6.7 minutes, and the mean withdrawal time was 8.7 minutes.The adenoma and polyp detection rates were 28.1% and 41.8%, respectively.The polyp, adenoma, and advanced adenoma detection rates did not correlate with the quality of bowel preparation.The multivariate analysis showed age ≥ 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.97;P = 0.040), body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m 2 (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.17-2.08;P = 0.002) and current smoking (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01-2.06;P = 0.014) to be independent risk factors for adenoma detection.Conclusion: The adenoma detection rate was unrelated to the quality of bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy.Older age, obesity, and smoking were independent risk factors for adenoma detection.
Key concepts: Medicine, Colonoscopy, Adenoma, Withdrawal time, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Body mass index, Confidence interval