2017•DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Open access

Comparing the Injection Pain of Propofol Emulsion 1% (MCT/LCT) and Propofol Emulsion 2% (Propofol Lipuro) in Combination with Lidocaine in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery with General Anesthesia

Anahita Hirmanpour, Reihanak Talakoub, Mohammadreza Safavi, Azim Honarmand, Amir Shafa, Kamelia Emamdoost

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Background: Propofol causes a high incidence of pain during intravenous injection. The aim of this study was to compare incidence and severity of injection pain following the administration of two different formulations of Propofol with and without 10mg Lidocaine in female patients. Methods: One hundred ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade I and II patients, planned to undergo gynecologic surgery under general anesthesia, were included in four groups of 25 in a prospectively, randomized and double-blind study. Group A received Propofol 1%+10mg lidocaine (1cc of lidocaine1%), Group B received Propofol 1%+ 1cc preservative-free saline, Group C received Lipuropropofol +10mg lidocaine (1cc of lidocaine1%) and Group D received Lipuropropofol+1cc preservative-free saline. Injection pain was assessed using the McCrirrick and Hunter scale. Results: No differences were found in the mean age, weight and given dose of propofol administered between all groups (P>0.05). Comparison of groups revealed significant difference in pain scores between groups (mean pain scores, GroupA:2.84 ± 0.850 vs. GroupB:3.16 ± 0.800 vs. GroupC:1.8±0.866 vs. GroupD:2.12±0.833 points). Conclusion: The highest pain scores were found in the propofol1% without lidocaine use while lipuropropofol plus lidocaine had the lowest pain scores. We recommend premixing 10 mg of lidocaine to Lipuropropofolfor preventing or mitigation of propofol injection pain compared to Lipuropropofol alone or propofol1% with lidocaine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Propofol causes a high incidence of pain during intravenous injection. The aim of this study was to compare incidence and severity of injection pain following the administration of two different formulations of Propofol with and without 10mg Lidocaine in female patients. Methods: One hundred ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade I and II patients, planned to undergo gynecologic surgery under general anesthesia, were included in four groups of 25 in a prospectively, randomized and double-blind study. Group A received Propofol 1%+10mg lidocaine (1cc of lidocaine1%), Group B received Propofol 1%+ 1cc preservative-free saline, Group C received Lipuropropofol +10mg lidocaine (1cc of lidocaine1%) and Group D received Lipuropropofol+1cc preservative-free saline. Injection pain was assessed using the McCrirrick and Hunter scale. Results: No differences were found in the mean age, weight and given dose of propofol administered between all groups (P>0.05). Comparison of groups revealed significant difference in pain scores between groups (mean pain scores, GroupA:2.84 ± 0.850 vs. GroupB:3.16 ± 0.800 vs. GroupC:1.8±0.866 vs. GroupD:2.12±0.833 points). Conclusion: The highest pain scores were found in the propofol1% without lidocaine use while lipuropropofol plus lidocaine had the lowest pain scores. We recommend premixing 10 mg of lidocaine to Lipuropropofolfor preventing or mitigation of propofol injection pain compared to Lipuropropofol alone or propofol1% with lidocaine.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Propofol causes a high incidence of pain during intravenous injection. The aim of this study was to compare incidence and severity of injection pain following the administration of two different formulations of Propofol with and without 10mg Lidocaine in female patients. Methods: One hundred ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade I and II patients, planned to undergo gynecologic surgery under general anesthesia, were included in four groups of 25 in a prospectively, randomized and double-blind study. Group A received Propofol 1%+10mg lidocaine (1cc of lidocaine1%), Group B received Propofol 1%+ 1cc preservative-free saline, Group C received Lipuropropofol +10mg lidocaine (1cc of lidocaine1%) and Group D received Lipuropropofol+1cc preservative-free saline. Injection pain was assessed using the McCrirrick and Hunter scale. Results: No differences were found in the mean age, weight and given dose of propofol administered between all groups (P>0.05). Comparison of groups revealed significant difference in pain scores between groups (mean pain scores, GroupA:2.84 ± 0.850 vs. GroupB:3.16 ± 0.800 vs. GroupC:1.8±0.866 vs. GroupD:2.12±0.833 points). Conclusion: The highest pain scores were found in the propofol1% without lidocaine use while lipuropropofol plus lidocaine had the lowest pain scores. We recommend premixing 10 mg of lidocaine to Lipuropropofolfor preventing or mitigation of propofol injection pain compared to Lipuropropofol alone or propofol1% with lidocaine.

Key concepts: Propofol, Medicine, Lidocaine, Anesthesia, Saline, Surgery, Incidence (geometry), Optics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparing the Injection Pain of Propofol Emulsion 1% (MCT/LCT) and Propofol Emulsion 2% (Propofol Lipuro) in Combination with Lidocaine in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery with General Anesthesia — Research Paper | ScholarLens