2017Journal of Gynecologic OncologyOpen access

Highlights from the Gynecologic Oncology Track at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Juliet Elizabeth Wolford, Krishnansu S. Tewari

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Surgical trials: lymphadenectomy in ovarian neoplasms (LION) and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP III/ENGOT ov20 trialSurgical trials have been historically difficult to execute because of the inherent complexity of standardizing surgical procedures.Differences in technique and expertise between one surgeon to the next, as well as for the difficulty with blinding within a surgical trial continue to represent the most troublesome hurdles in trial design.The above notwithstanding, two successful surgical trials where presented this year, with findings that could change the surgical management of patients with advanced/recurrent ovarian cancer.The first trial was the lymphadenectomy (LAD) in ovarian cancer, or the LION trial.This trial was a randomized, prospective study of utilizing a systemic LAD vs. no LAD in those newly diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIB-IV ovarian cancer with clinically and radiologic negative lymph nodes (LNs) (Fig. 1).To overcome the surgeon expertise and technique variance, centers had to qualify in surgical skills prior to participation in the trial.Importantly, patients underwent randomization after complete surgical cytoreduction had been achieved, with optimal debulking defined as a complete macroscopic resection.This trial showed no improvement in overall survival (OS) (69 months with no LAD vs. 65 months with LAD; hazard ratio [HR]=1.06;95% confidence interval [CI]=0.83-1.34;

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Surgical trials: lymphadenectomy in ovarian neoplasms (LION) and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP III/ENGOT ov20 trialSurgical trials have been historically difficult to execute because of the inherent complexity of standardizing surgical procedures.Differences in technique and expertise between one surgeon to the next, as well as for the difficulty with blinding within a surgical trial continue to represent the most troublesome hurdles in trial design.The above notwithstanding, two successful surgical trials where presented this year, with findings that could change the surgical management of patients with advanced/recurrent ovarian cancer.The first trial was the lymphadenectomy (LAD) in ovarian cancer, or the LION trial.This trial was a randomized, prospective study of utilizing a systemic LAD vs. no LAD in those newly diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIB-IV ovarian cancer with clinically and radiologic negative lymph nodes (LNs) (Fig. 1).To overcome the surgeon expertise and technique variance, centers had to qualify in surgical skills prior to participation in the trial.Importantly, patients underwent randomization after complete surgical cytoreduction had been achieved, with optimal debulking defined as a complete macroscopic resection.This trial showed no improvement in overall survival (OS) (69 months with no LAD vs. 65 months with LAD; hazard ratio [HR]=1.06;95% confidence interval [CI]=0.83-1.34;

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Surgical trials: lymphadenectomy in ovarian neoplasms (LION) and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP III/ENGOT ov20 trialSurgical trials have been historically difficult to execute because of the inherent complexity of standardizing surgical procedures.Differences in technique and expertise between one surgeon to the next, as well as for the difficulty with blinding within a surgical trial continue to represent the most troublesome hurdles in trial design.The above notwithstanding, two successful surgical trials where presented this year, with findings that could change the surgical management of patients with advanced/recurrent ovarian cancer.The first trial was the lymphadenectomy (LAD) in ovarian cancer, or the LION trial.This trial was a randomized, prospective study of utilizing a systemic LAD vs. no LAD in those newly diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIB-IV ovarian cancer with clinically and radiologic negative lymph nodes (LNs) (Fig. 1).To overcome the surgeon expertise and technique variance, centers had to qualify in surgical skills prior to participation in the trial.Importantly, patients underwent randomization after complete surgical cytoreduction had been achieved, with optimal debulking defined as a complete macroscopic resection.This trial showed no improvement in overall survival (OS) (69 months with no LAD vs. 65 months with LAD; hazard ratio [HR]=1.06;95% confidence interval [CI]=0.83-1.34;

Key concepts: Medicine, Gynecologic oncology, Clinical Oncology, Oncology, Internal medicine, Radiation oncology, Medical physics, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Highlights from the Gynecologic Oncology Track at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology — Research Paper | ScholarLens