2017The Journal of the Geological Society of JapanOpen access

Historical record of lahar related to phreatic or phreatomagmatic eruption

Masayuki Sakagami, Masaru Kunitomo

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Once the volcano erupted, fallen ash accumulated on the ground flew easily even by slight rainfall and generated lahar, which sometimes caused disaster. Therefore, certain criteria are required to evaluate the possibility of lahar after the eruption. It is, however, not well understood under which process or conditions lahar were occurred in the past. For the purpose of future volcanic disaster prevention, we reviewed the historical records of the lahar in japan related to phreatic or phreatomagmatic eruption. Totally 60 records were investigated, and the process of the lahar could be classified into 12 patterns. The most frequent type was secondary lahar (triggered by rain) and the next was primary lahar (induced by hydrothermal water). According to the research of rainfall records on four volcanoes, initial secondary lahar may be produced particularly when the rainfall rate was approximately 11-35 mm/hour which was maximum experienced hourly rainfall after the eruption.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Once the volcano erupted, fallen ash accumulated on the ground flew easily even by slight rainfall and generated lahar, which sometimes caused disaster. Therefore, certain criteria are required to evaluate the possibility of lahar after the eruption. It is, however, not well understood under which process or conditions lahar were occurred in the past. For the purpose of future volcanic disaster prevention, we reviewed the historical records of the lahar in japan related to phreatic or phreatomagmatic eruption. Totally 60 records were investigated, and the process of the lahar could be classified into 12 patterns. The most frequent type was secondary lahar (triggered by rain) and the next was primary lahar (induced by hydrothermal water). According to the research of rainfall records on four volcanoes, initial secondary lahar may be produced particularly when the rainfall rate was approximately 11-35 mm/hour which was maximum experienced hourly rainfall after the eruption.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Once the volcano erupted, fallen ash accumulated on the ground flew easily even by slight rainfall and generated lahar, which sometimes caused disaster. Therefore, certain criteria are required to evaluate the possibility of lahar after the eruption. It is, however, not well understood under which process or conditions lahar were occurred in the past. For the purpose of future volcanic disaster prevention, we reviewed the historical records of the lahar in japan related to phreatic or phreatomagmatic eruption. Totally 60 records were investigated, and the process of the lahar could be classified into 12 patterns. The most frequent type was secondary lahar (triggered by rain) and the next was primary lahar (induced by hydrothermal water). According to the research of rainfall records on four volcanoes, initial secondary lahar may be produced particularly when the rainfall rate was approximately 11-35 mm/hour which was maximum experienced hourly rainfall after the eruption.

Key concepts: Lahar, Phreatomagmatic eruption, Phreatic, Geology, Phreatic eruption, Volcano, Aggradation, Hydrology (agriculture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Historical record of lahar related to phreatic or phreatomagmatic eruption — Research Paper | ScholarLens