Some New Results on Ridge Regression Estimation
Karl K. Lin, Jan Kmenta
Abstract
Open-access reader
Karl K. Lin, Jan Kmenta
Abstract
Open-access reader
In this paper we consider various interpretations of the ordinary ridge regression estimator with a given shrinkage factor k, and report the results of an extensive Monte Carlo of several ridge regression estimators involving sample-based rules for selecting k. A major distinguishing feature of the study is the use of a general loss structure, the p-norm, in the evaluation process. Other factors taken into consideration include different degree of ill-conditioning of data, different number of explanatory variables, and different shape and non-centrality of the regression coefficients. The main results are: (i) With minor exceptions, all the ridge regression estimators considered yield a smaller average loss regardless of the loss function used. (ii) The reduction in the average loss of the ridge regression estimators increases when the degree ill-conditioning of data increases. The reduction reaches a substantial level when the degree of ill-conditioning is only moderate. (iii) On the basis of our experiment it is possible to make a recomendation concerning the rule of k.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this paper we consider various interpretations of the ordinary ridge regression estimator with a given shrinkage factor k, and report the results of an extensive Monte Carlo of several ridge regression estimators involving sample-based rules for selecting k. A major distinguishing feature of the study is the use of a general loss structure, the p-norm, in the evaluation process. Other factors taken into consideration include different degree of ill-conditioning of data, different number of explanatory variables, and different shape and non-centrality of the regression coefficients. The main results are: (i) With minor exceptions, all the ridge regression estimators considered yield a smaller average loss regardless of the loss function used. (ii) The reduction in the average loss of the ridge regression estimators increases when the degree ill-conditioning of data increases. The reduction reaches a substantial level when the degree of ill-conditioning is only moderate. (iii) On the basis of our experiment it is possible to make a recomendation concerning the rule of k.
Key concepts: Ridge, Estimation, Regression, Geology, Statistics, Regression analysis, Mathematics, Geography