2011Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Requires access

Modeling of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Flow Control Simulations

Denis Palmeiro

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Single-dielectric-barrier-discharge (SDBD) plasma actuators have shown much promise as an actuator for active flow control. Proper design and optimization of plasma actuators requires a model capable of accurately predicting the induced flow for a range of geometrical and excitation parameters. A number of models have been proposed in the literature, but have primarily been developed in isolation on independent geometries, frequencies and voltages. This study presents a comparison of four popular plasma actuator models over a range of actuation parameters for three different actuator geometries typical of actuators used in the literature. The results show that the hybrid model of Lemire & Vo (2011) is the only model capable of predicting the appropriate trends of the induced velocity for different geometries. Additionally, several modifications of this model have been integrated into a new proposed model for the plasma actuator, introducing a number of improvements.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Single-dielectric-barrier-discharge (SDBD) plasma actuators have shown much promise as an actuator for active flow control. Proper design and optimization of plasma actuators requires a model capable of accurately predicting the induced flow for a range of geometrical and excitation parameters. A number of models have been proposed in the literature, but have primarily been developed in isolation on independent geometries, frequencies and voltages. This study presents a comparison of four popular plasma actuator models over a range of actuation parameters for three different actuator geometries typical of actuators used in the literature. The results show that the hybrid model of Lemire & Vo (2011) is the only model capable of predicting the appropriate trends of the induced velocity for different geometries. Additionally, several modifications of this model have been integrated into a new proposed model for the plasma actuator, introducing a number of improvements.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Single-dielectric-barrier-discharge (SDBD) plasma actuators have shown much promise as an actuator for active flow control. Proper design and optimization of plasma actuators requires a model capable of accurately predicting the induced flow for a range of geometrical and excitation parameters. A number of models have been proposed in the literature, but have primarily been developed in isolation on independent geometries, frequencies and voltages. This study presents a comparison of four popular plasma actuator models over a range of actuation parameters for three different actuator geometries typical of actuators used in the literature. The results show that the hybrid model of Lemire & Vo (2011) is the only model capable of predicting the appropriate trends of the induced velocity for different geometries. Additionally, several modifications of this model have been integrated into a new proposed model for the plasma actuator, introducing a number of improvements.

Key concepts: Plasma actuator, Dielectric barrier discharge, Plasma, Flow control (data), Materials science, Flow (mathematics), Dielectric, Mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modeling of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Flow Control Simulations — Research Paper | ScholarLens