2017Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgeryOpen access

Determinants Analysis of Satisfaction with Supporting System for Hearing Aids

Jung Hyun Chang, Chang Eui Hong, Jun Cheol Park, Jung Kyu Choi, Hyun Seung Choi

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesZZHearing disability has a negative impact on the psychological condition and the quality of life of patients, as well as their daily lives.This study tries to identify the relationship between personal perception of the national supporting system for hearing aids and the satisfaction of the supporting system on the part of users, suppliers and specialists.Subjects and MethodZZA total of seven questions were developed to identify factors that can affect the satisfaction of national supporting system for hearing aids.We surveyed hearing aids users, suppliers, and specialist; the final sample included 455 subjects.ResultsZZDeterminants of satisfaction were adequacy of accepted durability of hearing aids, accessibility to relevant information, necessity of graded financial support by type of hearing aids, necessity of supporting repair cost and necessity of graded financial support by kind of disability rating.According to the results of multiple logistic regression analysis, subjects who answered that accepted durability of hearing aids [odd ratio (OR): 2.03, confidence interval (CI): 1.14-3.60]and accessibility to information (OR: 4.82, CI: 2.65-8.78)were proper showed tendency to be satisfied with support system for hearing aids.The subjects who answered that graded financial support by kind of hearing aids (OR: 1.98, CI: 1.10-3.59)and graded financial support by kind of disability rating (OR: 1.91 CI: 1.07-3.42)were necessary showed tendency to satisfy with support system for hearing aids.ConclusionZZIn order to enhance satisfaction in stakeholder perceptions of supporting system for hearing aids, the system needs provide users with better access to relevant information and help in the use and management of the hearing-aid device.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background and ObjectivesZZHearing disability has a negative impact on the psychological condition and the quality of life of patients, as well as their daily lives.This study tries to identify the relationship between personal perception of the national supporting system for hearing aids and the satisfaction of the supporting system on the part of users, suppliers and specialists.Subjects and MethodZZA total of seven questions were developed to identify factors that can affect the satisfaction of national supporting system for hearing aids.We surveyed hearing aids users, suppliers, and specialist; the final sample included 455 subjects.ResultsZZDeterminants of satisfaction were adequacy of accepted durability of hearing aids, accessibility to relevant information, necessity of graded financial support by type of hearing aids, necessity of supporting repair cost and necessity of graded financial support by kind of disability rating.According to the results of multiple logistic regression analysis, subjects who answered that accepted durability of hearing aids [odd ratio (OR): 2.03, confidence interval (CI): 1.14-3.60]and accessibility to information (OR: 4.82, CI: 2.65-8.78)were proper showed tendency to be satisfied with support system for hearing aids.The subjects who answered that graded financial support by kind of hearing aids (OR: 1.98, CI: 1.10-3.59)and graded financial support by kind of disability rating (OR: 1.91 CI: 1.07-3.42)were necessary showed tendency to satisfy with support system for hearing aids.ConclusionZZIn order to enhance satisfaction in stakeholder perceptions of supporting system for hearing aids, the system needs provide users with better access to relevant information and help in the use and management of the hearing-aid device.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background and ObjectivesZZHearing disability has a negative impact on the psychological condition and the quality of life of patients, as well as their daily lives.This study tries to identify the relationship between personal perception of the national supporting system for hearing aids and the satisfaction of the supporting system on the part of users, suppliers and specialists.Subjects and MethodZZA total of seven questions were developed to identify factors that can affect the satisfaction of national supporting system for hearing aids.We surveyed hearing aids users, suppliers, and specialist; the final sample included 455 subjects.ResultsZZDeterminants of satisfaction were adequacy of accepted durability of hearing aids, accessibility to relevant information, necessity of graded financial support by type of hearing aids, necessity of supporting repair cost and necessity of graded financial support by kind of disability rating.According to the results of multiple logistic regression analysis, subjects who answered that accepted durability of hearing aids [odd ratio (OR): 2.03, confidence interval (CI): 1.14-3.60]and accessibility to information (OR: 4.82, CI: 2.65-8.78)were proper showed tendency to be satisfied with support system for hearing aids.The subjects who answered that graded financial support by kind of hearing aids (OR: 1.98, CI: 1.10-3.59)and graded financial support by kind of disability rating (OR: 1.91 CI: 1.07-3.42)were necessary showed tendency to satisfy with support system for hearing aids.ConclusionZZIn order to enhance satisfaction in stakeholder perceptions of supporting system for hearing aids, the system needs provide users with better access to relevant information and help in the use and management of the hearing-aid device.

Key concepts: Affect (linguistics), Perception, Hearing loss, Quality of life (healthcare), Logistic regression, Confidence interval, Medicine, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Determinants Analysis of Satisfaction with Supporting System for Hearing Aids — Research Paper | ScholarLens