2016PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of Verapamil and Amlodipine for Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Hypertensive Disease].

С. Г. Канорский, A. F. Sereda

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to compare efficacy of verapamil and amlodipine in treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) in patients with hypertensive disease (HD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with stage III HD, class II-III CHF, and LVEF more or equal 50% (n=167, age 48-70 years) underwent complex examination before and after 12 months of treatment with perindopril combined either with verapamil SR (n=85) or amlodipine (n=82). RESULTS: Average 6-minute walk distance increased after both verapamil and amlodipine containing treatment (by 15.1 and 18.2%, respectively). Administration of both drugs was associated with improvement of clinical state and quality of life. But only treatment containing amlodipine was associated with lowering of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide and improvement of echocardiographic parameters of LV diastolic function. CONCLUSION: In treatment of CHF in patients with HD amlodipine is at least not inferior to verapamil for elevation of exercise tolerance and superior to verapamil for improvement of LV diastolic function. Amlodipine might be perspective for use in patients with chronotropic incompetence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: to compare efficacy of verapamil and amlodipine in treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) in patients with hypertensive disease (HD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with stage III HD, class II-III CHF, and LVEF more or equal 50% (n=167, age 48-70 years) underwent complex examination before and after 12 months of treatment with perindopril combined either with verapamil SR (n=85) or amlodipine (n=82). RESULTS: Average 6-minute walk distance increased after both verapamil and amlodipine containing treatment (by 15.1 and 18.2%, respectively). Administration of both drugs was associated with improvement of clinical state and quality of life. But only treatment containing amlodipine was associated with lowering of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide and improvement of echocardiographic parameters of LV diastolic function. CONCLUSION: In treatment of CHF in patients with HD amlodipine is at least not inferior to verapamil for elevation of exercise tolerance and superior to verapamil for improvement of LV diastolic function. Amlodipine might be perspective for use in patients with chronotropic incompetence.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: to compare efficacy of verapamil and amlodipine in treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) in patients with hypertensive disease (HD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with stage III HD, class II-III CHF, and LVEF more or equal 50% (n=167, age 48-70 years) underwent complex examination before and after 12 months of treatment with perindopril combined either with verapamil SR (n=85) or amlodipine (n=82). RESULTS: Average 6-minute walk distance increased after both verapamil and amlodipine containing treatment (by 15.1 and 18.2%, respectively). Administration of both drugs was associated with improvement of clinical state and quality of life. But only treatment containing amlodipine was associated with lowering of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide and improvement of echocardiographic parameters of LV diastolic function. CONCLUSION: In treatment of CHF in patients with HD amlodipine is at least not inferior to verapamil for elevation of exercise tolerance and superior to verapamil for improvement of LV diastolic function. Amlodipine might be perspective for use in patients with chronotropic incompetence.

Key concepts: Verapamil, Amlodipine, Medicine, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Ejection fraction, Heart failure, Perindopril

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of Verapamil and Amlodipine for Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Hypertensive Disease]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens