1976Unpublished venueRequires access

Calibration of the AEDC-PWT 16-ft Transonic Tunnel at Test Section Wall Porosities of Two, Four, and Six Percent

Frank M. Jackson

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract : Tests were conducted in the AEDC Propulsion Wind Tunnel (16T) to determine the centerline Mach number distributions and the tunnel calibration at test section wall porosities of two, four, and six percent. The calibration was conducted over the Mach number range from 0.2 to 1.6. A quantitative evaluation of the effects of Mach number, tunnel pressure ratio, test section wall angle, and test section wall porosity upon the centerline Mach number distributions was determined by analysis of the local Mach number deviations. Limited data were also obtained to provide an indication of the effect of Reynolds number upon the calibration. The results indicate that Mach number distributions of good flow quality are obtained at porosities of two, four, and six percent for test section wall angles which vary from 0 to 0.50 deg. Variation of test section wall porosity, as well as wall angle, significantly affects the Tunnel 16T calibration. Comparison of this calibration with a previous calibration, however, indicates that no new tunnel calibration is required for operation at a porosity of six percent with either a zero or optimum wall angle schedule.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : Tests were conducted in the AEDC Propulsion Wind Tunnel (16T) to determine the centerline Mach number distributions and the tunnel calibration at test section wall porosities of two, four, and six percent. The calibration was conducted over the Mach number range from 0.2 to 1.6. A quantitative evaluation of the effects of Mach number, tunnel pressure ratio, test section wall angle, and test section wall porosity upon the centerline Mach number distributions was determined by analysis of the local Mach number deviations. Limited data were also obtained to provide an indication of the effect of Reynolds number upon the calibration. The results indicate that Mach number distributions of good flow quality are obtained at porosities of two, four, and six percent for test section wall angles which vary from 0 to 0.50 deg. Variation of test section wall porosity, as well as wall angle, significantly affects the Tunnel 16T calibration. Comparison of this calibration with a previous calibration, however, indicates that no new tunnel calibration is required for operation at a porosity of six percent with either a zero or optimum wall angle schedule.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : Tests were conducted in the AEDC Propulsion Wind Tunnel (16T) to determine the centerline Mach number distributions and the tunnel calibration at test section wall porosities of two, four, and six percent. The calibration was conducted over the Mach number range from 0.2 to 1.6. A quantitative evaluation of the effects of Mach number, tunnel pressure ratio, test section wall angle, and test section wall porosity upon the centerline Mach number distributions was determined by analysis of the local Mach number deviations. Limited data were also obtained to provide an indication of the effect of Reynolds number upon the calibration. The results indicate that Mach number distributions of good flow quality are obtained at porosities of two, four, and six percent for test section wall angles which vary from 0 to 0.50 deg. Variation of test section wall porosity, as well as wall angle, significantly affects the Tunnel 16T calibration. Comparison of this calibration with a previous calibration, however, indicates that no new tunnel calibration is required for operation at a porosity of six percent with either a zero or optimum wall angle schedule.

Key concepts: Transonic, Section (typography), Calibration, Geology, Physics, Computer science, Mathematics, Mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Calibration of the AEDC-PWT 16-ft Transonic Tunnel at Test Section Wall Porosities of Two, Four, and Six Percent — Research Paper | ScholarLens