2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Economics of Remedies

Ariel Porat

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Remedies in different legal fields have much in common, and the study of remedies can teach us a lot, especially when the goals of the substantive legal fields are similar. Consider tort law and contract law. Under its efficiency rationale, tort law should minimize social costs, thereby enhancing social welfare. In order to achieve this goal, tort law should provide incentives for both the injurer and the victim to take efficient precautions. Similarly, contract law should also provide the parties with efficient incentives, in order to enable them to maximize the contractual surplus. In both torts and contracts, providing the injurer/promisor and the victim/promisee with efficient incentives is done through a combination of substantive and remedial law. Thus, both legal fields share much in common and often are adapted to the legal context to which they apply. The chapter emphasizes the common denominators of the remedies in torts and contracts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Remedies in different legal fields have much in common, and the study of remedies can teach us a lot, especially when the goals of the substantive legal fields are similar. Consider tort law and contract law. Under its efficiency rationale, tort law should minimize social costs, thereby enhancing social welfare. In order to achieve this goal, tort law should provide incentives for both the injurer and the victim to take efficient precautions. Similarly, contract law should also provide the parties with efficient incentives, in order to enable them to maximize the contractual surplus. In both torts and contracts, providing the injurer/promisor and the victim/promisee with efficient incentives is done through a combination of substantive and remedial law. Thus, both legal fields share much in common and often are adapted to the legal context to which they apply. The chapter emphasizes the common denominators of the remedies in torts and contracts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Remedies in different legal fields have much in common, and the study of remedies can teach us a lot, especially when the goals of the substantive legal fields are similar. Consider tort law and contract law. Under its efficiency rationale, tort law should minimize social costs, thereby enhancing social welfare. In order to achieve this goal, tort law should provide incentives for both the injurer and the victim to take efficient precautions. Similarly, contract law should also provide the parties with efficient incentives, in order to enable them to maximize the contractual surplus. In both torts and contracts, providing the injurer/promisor and the victim/promisee with efficient incentives is done through a combination of substantive and remedial law. Thus, both legal fields share much in common and often are adapted to the legal context to which they apply. The chapter emphasizes the common denominators of the remedies in torts and contracts.

Key concepts: Tort, Incentive, Order (exchange), Context (archaeology), Delict, Law and economics, Business, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Economics of Remedies — Research Paper | ScholarLens