2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Response and control of a levitation module under track irregularities when the maglev train is traveling

Danfeng Zhou, Peichang Yu, Jie Li, Lianchun Wang

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The EMS (Electro-Magnetic Suspension) maglev train uses attractive magnetic forces to neutralize its weight, which puts a rather high requirement on the smoothness of the track since the levitation gap is generally 8~10 mm. It has been observed that in a traveling urban maglev train, the levitation gap error of the rear levitation unit in a levitation module is generally more prominent than that of the front levitation units; and under poor track conditions, the rear electromagnet of the levitation unit is more likely to clash with the track and to cause a levitation failure. However, this phenomenon has not yet been well interpreted. In this paper, a model of the levitation module in a maglev train is built to study the responses of the levitation gaps under different vehicle speed and track conditions, and results show that the levitation module is sensitive to some specified wavelengths of the track irregularities, and the analysis well interprets the reason that causes the difference of the response for the front and the rear levitation unit under track irregularities. A control strategy is also proposed to reduce the rear gap fluctuation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The EMS (Electro-Magnetic Suspension) maglev train uses attractive magnetic forces to neutralize its weight, which puts a rather high requirement on the smoothness of the track since the levitation gap is generally 8~10 mm. It has been observed that in a traveling urban maglev train, the levitation gap error of the rear levitation unit in a levitation module is generally more prominent than that of the front levitation units; and under poor track conditions, the rear electromagnet of the levitation unit is more likely to clash with the track and to cause a levitation failure. However, this phenomenon has not yet been well interpreted. In this paper, a model of the levitation module in a maglev train is built to study the responses of the levitation gaps under different vehicle speed and track conditions, and results show that the levitation module is sensitive to some specified wavelengths of the track irregularities, and the analysis well interprets the reason that causes the difference of the response for the front and the rear levitation unit under track irregularities. A control strategy is also proposed to reduce the rear gap fluctuation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The EMS (Electro-Magnetic Suspension) maglev train uses attractive magnetic forces to neutralize its weight, which puts a rather high requirement on the smoothness of the track since the levitation gap is generally 8~10 mm. It has been observed that in a traveling urban maglev train, the levitation gap error of the rear levitation unit in a levitation module is generally more prominent than that of the front levitation units; and under poor track conditions, the rear electromagnet of the levitation unit is more likely to clash with the track and to cause a levitation failure. However, this phenomenon has not yet been well interpreted. In this paper, a model of the levitation module in a maglev train is built to study the responses of the levitation gaps under different vehicle speed and track conditions, and results show that the levitation module is sensitive to some specified wavelengths of the track irregularities, and the analysis well interprets the reason that causes the difference of the response for the front and the rear levitation unit under track irregularities. A control strategy is also proposed to reduce the rear gap fluctuation.

Key concepts: Maglev, Levitation, Magnetic levitation, Track (disk drive), Electromagnetic suspension, Electrodynamic suspension, Spin-stabilized magnetic levitation, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Response and control of a levitation module under track irregularities when the maglev train is traveling — Research Paper | ScholarLens