Firm Performance and Executive Compensation Structure
Xia JIN, Meng-Lei JIN
Abstract
Xia JIN, Meng-Lei JIN
Abstract
This issue examines the executive compensation structure of 828 non-financial U.S. firms, providing the evidence which supports incentive compensation. This issue shows that the total compensation level positively affects firm performance, as measured by Tobin’s Q and ROA. Different from the prior empirical research, this issue represents that not all the type of equity-based compensation motivates the top managers to increase firm value. The empirical results reveal that stock options have no effect on corporate performance, while restricted stocks have significantly positive influence on firm performance. Thus, the firm should be critical thinking when using equity-based compensation. Also, the major compensation type, salary, has a passive effect on firm performance. Finally, the authors find that the link between compensation structure and corporate performance is stronger than the link between total compensation level and corporate performance. That means compensation structure provide more incentives for executives to maximise firm value.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This issue examines the executive compensation structure of 828 non-financial U.S. firms, providing the evidence which supports incentive compensation. This issue shows that the total compensation level positively affects firm performance, as measured by Tobin’s Q and ROA. Different from the prior empirical research, this issue represents that not all the type of equity-based compensation motivates the top managers to increase firm value. The empirical results reveal that stock options have no effect on corporate performance, while restricted stocks have significantly positive influence on firm performance. Thus, the firm should be critical thinking when using equity-based compensation. Also, the major compensation type, salary, has a passive effect on firm performance. Finally, the authors find that the link between compensation structure and corporate performance is stronger than the link between total compensation level and corporate performance. That means compensation structure provide more incentives for executives to maximise firm value.
Key concepts: Executive compensation, Salary, Incentive, Enterprise value, Compensation (psychology), Equity (law), Business, Stock options