2010Unpublished venueRequires access

COMPARISON OF ESEM AND SEM IN MORPHOLOGY STUDIES OF PARASITICVERTEBRATE NEMATODE

Šárka Mašová, Petr Wandrol, Vlastimil Baruš

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Ascaridoid nematode species Brevimulticaecum heterotis obtained by parasitological dissection from the African bonytongue, Heterotis niloticus (Osteoglossidae) collected in Senegal has been chosen for studies by scanning electron microscope to redescribe its external morphology. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) were used for the study. For SEM, specimens were fixed with hot formalin. They were dehydrated, critical-point dried, mounted on stubs and coated with gold. For ESEM, fixed specimens were hydrated with water; desiccation was not applied. Quanta 3D FEG and Quanta 250 FEG in SEM and ESEM mode were used. Combination of both techniques brings new level to nematode investigation. While SEM remains unsubstitutable method for study of nematode morphology due to its ease of use, ESEM is an unexceptionable instrument when there is only one unique specimen that cannot be destroyed or must remain available for molecular studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ascaridoid nematode species Brevimulticaecum heterotis obtained by parasitological dissection from the African bonytongue, Heterotis niloticus (Osteoglossidae) collected in Senegal has been chosen for studies by scanning electron microscope to redescribe its external morphology. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) were used for the study. For SEM, specimens were fixed with hot formalin. They were dehydrated, critical-point dried, mounted on stubs and coated with gold. For ESEM, fixed specimens were hydrated with water; desiccation was not applied. Quanta 3D FEG and Quanta 250 FEG in SEM and ESEM mode were used. Combination of both techniques brings new level to nematode investigation. While SEM remains unsubstitutable method for study of nematode morphology due to its ease of use, ESEM is an unexceptionable instrument when there is only one unique specimen that cannot be destroyed or must remain available for molecular studies.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ascaridoid nematode species Brevimulticaecum heterotis obtained by parasitological dissection from the African bonytongue, Heterotis niloticus (Osteoglossidae) collected in Senegal has been chosen for studies by scanning electron microscope to redescribe its external morphology. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) were used for the study. For SEM, specimens were fixed with hot formalin. They were dehydrated, critical-point dried, mounted on stubs and coated with gold. For ESEM, fixed specimens were hydrated with water; desiccation was not applied. Quanta 3D FEG and Quanta 250 FEG in SEM and ESEM mode were used. Combination of both techniques brings new level to nematode investigation. While SEM remains unsubstitutable method for study of nematode morphology due to its ease of use, ESEM is an unexceptionable instrument when there is only one unique specimen that cannot be destroyed or must remain available for molecular studies.

Key concepts: Environmental scanning electron microscope, Scanning electron microscope, Morphology (biology), Materials science, Nematode, Composite material, Biology, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON OF ESEM AND SEM IN MORPHOLOGY STUDIES OF PARASITICVERTEBRATE NEMATODE — Research Paper | ScholarLens