2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Mobilization, Informal Networks and the Social Contexts of Turnout

Pedro C. Magalhães, Paolo Segatti, Tianjian Shi

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses an existing general theory and research about mobilization by parties, secondary associations and the media and then turns their attention to the role of interpersonal networks. They use Comparative National Elections Project (CNEP) data to examine the extent to which the electorate exposure to mobilization efforts contributes to the explanation of turnout, as well as the extent to which the decision to vote is contingent on the attributes and behaviors of those with whom they interact in informal groups. Voting is compulsory, sanctions for non-voting exist and those sanctions are typically enforced, using the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) Voter Turnout data set. The direction of the relationship between our estimates of direct and indirect mobilization effects and the two macro-level variables are in the expected direction: positive for Age of Democracy and negative for Margin of Victory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses an existing general theory and research about mobilization by parties, secondary associations and the media and then turns their attention to the role of interpersonal networks. They use Comparative National Elections Project (CNEP) data to examine the extent to which the electorate exposure to mobilization efforts contributes to the explanation of turnout, as well as the extent to which the decision to vote is contingent on the attributes and behaviors of those with whom they interact in informal groups. Voting is compulsory, sanctions for non-voting exist and those sanctions are typically enforced, using the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) Voter Turnout data set. The direction of the relationship between our estimates of direct and indirect mobilization effects and the two macro-level variables are in the expected direction: positive for Age of Democracy and negative for Margin of Victory.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses an existing general theory and research about mobilization by parties, secondary associations and the media and then turns their attention to the role of interpersonal networks. They use Comparative National Elections Project (CNEP) data to examine the extent to which the electorate exposure to mobilization efforts contributes to the explanation of turnout, as well as the extent to which the decision to vote is contingent on the attributes and behaviors of those with whom they interact in informal groups. Voting is compulsory, sanctions for non-voting exist and those sanctions are typically enforced, using the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) Voter Turnout data set. The direction of the relationship between our estimates of direct and indirect mobilization effects and the two macro-level variables are in the expected direction: positive for Age of Democracy and negative for Margin of Victory.

Key concepts: Turnout, Mobilization, Social mobilization, Political science, Politics, Voting, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mobilization, Informal Networks and the Social Contexts of Turnout — Research Paper | ScholarLens