Are There Snags in the System? Comparing Cavity Use among Nesting Birds in "Snag- rich" and "Snag-poor" Eastside Pine Forests 1
Steve Zack, T. Luke George, William F. Laudenslayer
Abstract
Steve Zack, T. Luke George, William F. Laudenslayer
Abstract
We compared the density of snags, snags with cavities, and cavity-nesting bird use at two sites in northern California: Blacks Mountain Experimental Forest, a site with large trees and large snags because of protection from logging, contrasted with the Goosenest Adaptive Management Area, where a century of logging left this forest with few large trees and snags. Indeed, there was a threefold difference between sites in total snags, and a fifteenfold difference in cavity-nesting bird use. However, we feel finding a “snags per acre” prescription is inadequate, as tree size, rate of snag generation, and mode of tree death have been disrupted this past century. We argue that understanding the interactions between fire, bark beetles, woodpecker foraging and excavating, sapwood decay organisms, snag “demography,” and cavity-nesting species ecological requirements apart from simply cavities are required in place of simply counting snags in landscapes.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We compared the density of snags, snags with cavities, and cavity-nesting bird use at two sites in northern California: Blacks Mountain Experimental Forest, a site with large trees and large snags because of protection from logging, contrasted with the Goosenest Adaptive Management Area, where a century of logging left this forest with few large trees and snags. Indeed, there was a threefold difference between sites in total snags, and a fifteenfold difference in cavity-nesting bird use. However, we feel finding a “snags per acre” prescription is inadequate, as tree size, rate of snag generation, and mode of tree death have been disrupted this past century. We argue that understanding the interactions between fire, bark beetles, woodpecker foraging and excavating, sapwood decay organisms, snag “demography,” and cavity-nesting species ecological requirements apart from simply cavities are required in place of simply counting snags in landscapes.
Key concepts: Snag, Woodpecker, Bark (sound), Foraging, Dead tree, Ecology, Nesting (process), Forestry