2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Are There Snags in the System? Comparing Cavity Use among Nesting Birds in "Snag- rich" and "Snag-poor" Eastside Pine Forests 1

Steve Zack, T. Luke George, William F. Laudenslayer

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

We compared the density of snags, snags with cavities, and cavity-nesting bird use at two sites in northern California: Blacks Mountain Experimental Forest, a site with large trees and large snags because of protection from logging, contrasted with the Goosenest Adaptive Management Area, where a century of logging left this forest with few large trees and snags. Indeed, there was a threefold difference between sites in total snags, and a fifteenfold difference in cavity-nesting bird use. However, we feel finding a “snags per acre” prescription is inadequate, as tree size, rate of snag generation, and mode of tree death have been disrupted this past century. We argue that understanding the interactions between fire, bark beetles, woodpecker foraging and excavating, sapwood decay organisms, snag “demography,” and cavity-nesting species ecological requirements apart from simply cavities are required in place of simply counting snags in landscapes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We compared the density of snags, snags with cavities, and cavity-nesting bird use at two sites in northern California: Blacks Mountain Experimental Forest, a site with large trees and large snags because of protection from logging, contrasted with the Goosenest Adaptive Management Area, where a century of logging left this forest with few large trees and snags. Indeed, there was a threefold difference between sites in total snags, and a fifteenfold difference in cavity-nesting bird use. However, we feel finding a “snags per acre” prescription is inadequate, as tree size, rate of snag generation, and mode of tree death have been disrupted this past century. We argue that understanding the interactions between fire, bark beetles, woodpecker foraging and excavating, sapwood decay organisms, snag “demography,” and cavity-nesting species ecological requirements apart from simply cavities are required in place of simply counting snags in landscapes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We compared the density of snags, snags with cavities, and cavity-nesting bird use at two sites in northern California: Blacks Mountain Experimental Forest, a site with large trees and large snags because of protection from logging, contrasted with the Goosenest Adaptive Management Area, where a century of logging left this forest with few large trees and snags. Indeed, there was a threefold difference between sites in total snags, and a fifteenfold difference in cavity-nesting bird use. However, we feel finding a “snags per acre” prescription is inadequate, as tree size, rate of snag generation, and mode of tree death have been disrupted this past century. We argue that understanding the interactions between fire, bark beetles, woodpecker foraging and excavating, sapwood decay organisms, snag “demography,” and cavity-nesting species ecological requirements apart from simply cavities are required in place of simply counting snags in landscapes.

Key concepts: Snag, Woodpecker, Bark (sound), Foraging, Dead tree, Ecology, Nesting (process), Forestry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Are There Snags in the System? Comparing Cavity Use among Nesting Birds in "Snag- rich" and "Snag-poor" Eastside Pine Forests 1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens